faz.net
Modern Retelling of Greek Myths Emphasizes Female Perspectives and Historical Accuracy
Sarah Iles Johnston's new book presents 140 concise retellings of Greek myths, emphasizing historical accuracy and the experiences of female victims, differing from previous approaches that focused on psychological interpretations or solely on goddesses; the book uses illustrations and a clear narrative style to appeal to modern readers.
- How does Sarah Iles Johnston's approach to retelling Greek myths differ from previous attempts, and what are the potential implications for how these stories are understood and consumed by modern audiences?
- This article compares and contrasts two approaches to presenting Greek myths: Gustav Schwab's accessible adaptations for youth and Sarah Iles Johnston's recent, more scholarly retelling. Johnston's book, featuring 140 concise narratives and illustrations, aims for broader accessibility while maintaining historical accuracy. It emphasizes the shock and suffering of female victims in myths, a perspective often overlooked.
- What are the key factors that Johnston identifies as contributing to the myths' enduring influence in ancient Greece, and how do these differ from the challenges faced in presenting them to contemporary audiences?
- Johnston's work counters the trend of pop-culture infused myth retellings by focusing on the historical accuracy and context of ancient sources. Unlike previous efforts emphasizing psychological interpretations or solely focusing on goddesses, Johnston provides a chronological, comprehensive overview, using a narrative style aimed at diverse readerships. Her approach prioritizes conveying the impact of violence on female figures, a significant shift in perspective.
- Given the potential for misinterpretation and the changing cultural landscape, how successfully does Johnston's work navigate the complexities of presenting violent and traumatic events within the Greek myths, and what are the potential ethical considerations involved?
- The success of Johnston's approach hinges on whether it can effectively bridge the gap between the ancient world and contemporary readers while retaining scholarly rigor. The concise format and illustrations suggest a strategy for attracting a wider audience than traditional academic treatments; however, the long-term impact and reception of her work remains to be seen. The inclusion of female perspectives, albeit cautiously presented, marks a notable departure from previous retellings.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the evolution of Greek myth adaptations, highlighting the increasing inclusion of female perspectives and the shift from simplified versions for children to more complex analyses for adults. This framing subtly positions modern, female-authored adaptations as superior, potentially overlooking the merits of older works and the complexities of interpretation across different periods. The positive portrayal of Johnston's book, emphasizing its accessibility and illustrated format, might also create a bias towards that specific adaptation.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and academic, but the framing of certain aspects could be perceived as subtly biased. For instance, the description of Laios's actions as "entführte Chrysippos und vergewaltigte ihn" (kidnapped Chrysippos and raped him) is direct, whereas a more nuanced analysis of the cultural context might be beneficial for a complete understanding. The choice of words in the description of Chrysippos's appearance ("bewegte sich mit großer Anmut und seine Haut, von der Sonne gebräunt und mit Öl eingerieben, glänzte wie Gold") might be interpreted as contributing to the context of the rape and therefore is not neutral.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses primarily on the presentation of Greek myths in various adaptations, particularly highlighting the shift towards incorporating female perspectives. However, it omits discussion of potential biases present in the original Greek texts themselves, which could significantly impact the interpretation of modern adaptations. The lack of analysis on potential biases in the source material limits a complete understanding of how biases are perpetuated or challenged. Further, the review doesn't analyze whether the selection of myths themselves introduces bias.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a dichotomy between Schwab's accessible adaptations and Kerényi's scholarly approach, suggesting a choice between simplification for youth and complex analysis for adults. This oversimplifies the range of possible adaptations and ignores the potential for accessible and nuanced presentations for various audiences. The implication that only female authors can offer a less biased perspective also creates a false dichotomy.
Gender Bias
The analysis notes a positive shift towards incorporating female perspectives and highlights the contributions of female authors like Haynes and Johnston. However, a deeper analysis of gender representation within the myths themselves and in the chosen adaptations is missing. While the author mentions Johnston's attempt to convey the trauma of victims of sexual violence, it lacks a critical evaluation of how gender is presented in the narratives and whether the presentation reinforces or challenges gender stereotypes within the original myths.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the adaptation and retelling of ancient Greek myths for modern audiences, highlighting the role of education in transmitting cultural heritage and promoting understanding of different perspectives. The creation of accessible versions of complex texts, such as Johnston's book, contributes to improved educational resources and potentially increased engagement with classical literature.