kathimerini.gr
Mossad's covert operation shifts Israel-Hezbollah war
Following a year-long war, Mossad detonated over 16,000 modified walkie-talkies and bombs planted among Hezbollah members in Lebanon in September 2024, resulting in widespread injuries and a subsequent ceasefire.
- How did Mossad successfully deceive Hezbollah into purchasing and deploying the explosive devices?
- Mossad agents created shell companies to sell over 16,000 modified walkie-talkies and larger bombs to Hezbollah. The devices were designed to detonate upon activation, causing significant injuries. The operation aimed to incapacitate Hezbollah fighters, shifting the war's momentum.
- What are the long-term strategic implications of Israel's shift towards targeted incapacitation in warfare?
- The Mossad's operation significantly altered the course of the Israel-Hezbollah conflict. The widespread injuries inflicted, coupled with the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, led to a ceasefire by November 2024. This demonstrates a shift in Israeli tactics towards targeted incapacitation rather than outright lethality.
- What was the immediate impact of the September 2024 detonation of thousands of Mossad-planted bombs in Lebanon?
- In September 2024, thousands of bombs disguised as walkie-talkies detonated across Lebanon, injuring Hezbollah members. Two former Mossad agents, speaking anonymously on CBS's "60 Minutes," detailed a decade-long operation to plant these devices, purchased by Hezbollah.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is structured to highlight the ingenuity and effectiveness of the Mossad operation. The descriptions of the planning and execution are detailed and presented with a tone of admiration. The suffering of the victims is mentioned but receives less emphasis than the strategic success of the operation. The headline (if one were to be created) would likely emphasize the Mossad's strategic victory.
Language Bias
The language used leans towards sensationalism, particularly in the descriptions of the aftermath of the bombings. Phrases like "absolute chaos" and descriptions of injured individuals create a dramatic effect. While this enhances reader engagement, it also risks overshadowing the human cost of the conflict. Neutral alternatives could focus on objective facts and avoid emotionally charged language.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Israeli perspective and the actions of Mossad agents. Alternative viewpoints, particularly from Hezbollah or Lebanese civilians affected by the bombings, are largely absent. This omission creates an unbalanced narrative and hinders a full understanding of the consequences and impacts of the events.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a simplified narrative of the conflict, focusing on the success of the Israeli operation and portraying Hezbollah as solely the victim. It overlooks the complexities of the conflict and the potential motivations and actions of Hezbollah that might have contributed to the situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes a covert Israeli operation that involved the detonation of explosives hidden inside walkie-talkies and other devices, causing significant casualties and chaos in Lebanon. This action escalated the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, undermining peace and stability in the region. The operation also involved deception and the creation of shell companies, which are actions that contradict the principles of justice and strong institutions.