pt.euronews.com
Motion of No Confidence Against European Commission Faces Vote
A motion of no confidence against the European Commission, requiring a two-thirds majority vote in the European Parliament, will be debated on Monday and voted on Thursday; nine previous attempts failed, with only one resignation in 1999 due to fraud allegations without a formal vote.
- What are the key issues driving this motion of no confidence, and how do they compare to previous attempts?
- This motion, triggered by at least one-tenth of MEPs, follows nine previous attempts to oust the Commission. Past failures, including one in 2014 related to the "Luxembourg Leaks", highlight the high threshold for success. Only one Commission has previously resigned due to a motion of no confidence, albeit without a formal vote.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of a successful motion of no confidence, considering the impact on EU policy and governance?
- The outcome will significantly impact the EU's political landscape. A successful vote could lead to substantial policy shifts and institutional instability. The vote's outcome will be closely watched, affecting the EU's executive branch's stability and future policymaking.
- What is the likelihood of success for the motion of no confidence against the European Commission, given the required supermajority and past precedents?
- A motion of no confidence against the European Commission will be debated and voted on in the European Parliament next week. A two-thirds majority of all members is needed to pass the motion, triggering the resignation of President Ursula von der Leyen and the entire Commission. The debate will be held on Monday, and the vote on Thursday.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses a motion of no confidence against the European Commission, a process that is essential for democratic accountability and the rule of law. The ability to hold the commission accountable through a formal process strengthens democratic institutions and promotes good governance. The described process, even if unsuccessful, underscores the importance of checks and balances within the EU political system.