Munich's Pasinger Heuweg: Geothermic Plant and Fire Station Project Approved Despite Local Opposition

Munich's Pasinger Heuweg: Geothermic Plant and Fire Station Project Approved Despite Local Opposition

sueddeutsche.de

Munich's Pasinger Heuweg: Geothermic Plant and Fire Station Project Approved Despite Local Opposition

A geothermic plant and a new fire station are planned for Pasinger Heuweg in Munich, resolving a space conflict and providing renewable energy for 70,000 households, despite concerns from a citizen initiative regarding noise and proximity to a cemetery.

German
Germany
PoliticsEnergy SecurityRenewable EnergyUrban PlanningMunichGeothermal EnergyPublic ConsultationFire Station
Munich City CouncilStadtwerke MünchenMunich Fire Department
Guido SchüreHolger Müller
How do the planned noise reduction measures address the concerns of residents and cemetery visitors near the new facility?
The project involves building a geothermic plant and a new fire station on a 32,000-square-meter site at Pasinger Heuweg, resolving space constraints and providing an alternative location for the fire station. The geothermic plant, with eight boreholes reaching 2300 meters, aims to supply 70,000 households with heat, requiring a multi-hundred-million-euro investment and completion by 2033.
What are the immediate consequences of building a geothermic plant and fire station at Pasinger Heuweg, and how does it address existing urban planning challenges?
A citizen initiative opposes a project adjacent to Untermenzinger Parkfriedhof, citing concerns for visitors. However, the city's cemetery administration and two district committees support the plan, viewing it as a solution to a long-standing dilemma involving the controversial development of the 'Erdbeerwiese'.
What are the potential long-term impacts of this project on the Untermenzing neighborhood, considering the combination of a geothermic plant and a new fire station, and what measures are in place to mitigate negative consequences?
The project's impact includes addressing the city's need for renewable energy while relocating the fire station to improve response times. While concerns exist regarding noise pollution near the cemetery and residential areas, mitigation measures like sound barriers and operational restrictions are planned. The project's success hinges on timely implementation and effective community engagement, ensuring the benefits outweigh potential disruptions.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the project positively, highlighting its benefits (geothermal energy, school placement, fire station relocation) and downplaying potential negative impacts on nearby residents and cemetery visitors. The headline (if any) would likely emphasize the positive aspects. The inclusion of quotes from project leaders expressing satisfaction further reinforces this positive framing. This could lead readers to overlook potential downsides.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses language that subtly favors the project. Phrases like "unverzichtbares, sehr durchdachtes Projekt" (indispensable, very well-considered project) from visitor feedback are presented without counterbalancing criticism. The description of the project's complexity as "Tetris" is an attempt to downplay the difficulties. The use of "optimistisch kalkuliert" (optimistically calculated) in reference to the timeline might also subtly downplay the potential for delays.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the positive aspects of the project, such as providing geothermal energy and resolving the school placement issue. However, it downplays potential negative impacts on residents, particularly the noise pollution from both the geothermal plant and the new fire station. While acknowledging resident concerns, the article doesn't delve into specific mitigation strategies beyond mentioning soundproofing measures. The article also omits discussion of alternative locations for the fire station, which could lessen the impact on residents and the cemetery.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the project as a necessary solution to the Erdbeerwiese dilemma, implying that the only alternatives are either the current proposal or leaving the issue unresolved. It fails to explore other potential solutions for the fire station or geothermal plant locations. This simplifies a complex issue and limits discussion of a wider range of options.

Sustainable Development Goals

Affordable and Clean Energy Positive
Direct Relevance

The project focuses on building a geothermal plant that will provide clean energy to 70,000 households in Munich. This directly contributes to affordable and clean energy production, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating climate change.