dw.com
Myanmar's 85 Internet Shutdowns in 2024: A Tool for War and Suppression
A new report reveals that Myanmar experienced 85 internet shutdowns in 2024, primarily orchestrated by the military junta to suppress dissent and control information during the civil war, often coinciding with human rights abuses and airstrikes; these shutdowns, alongside a new cybersecurity law banning VPNs, severely limit access to information for civilians.
- What are the primary consequences of the 85 internet shutdowns in Myanmar in 2024?
- In 2024, Myanmar experienced 85 internet shutdowns, primarily orchestrated by the military junta to suppress dissent and control information flow during the ongoing civil war. These shutdowns, often coinciding with human rights abuses and airstrikes, severely hampered access to vital information for civilians.
- How does the Myanmar junta's use of internet shutdowns connect to broader global trends in digital authoritarianism?
- The Myanmar junta's internet shutdowns, exceeding 75% of the country's total disruptions, are part of a broader strategy to control the narrative and hinder resistance efforts. This aligns with a global trend of digital authoritarianism, where governments use technology to restrict freedoms and silence opposition. The impact extends beyond propaganda; it leaves civilians vulnerable by limiting access to critical information about military movements and potential threats.
- What are the long-term implications of the internet shutdowns and restrictive cybersecurity laws for the people of Myanmar?
- The increasing reliance on expensive and limited satellite internet solutions, like Starlink, by anti-junta media and rebel groups highlights the severe consequences of the junta's actions. This digital divide exacerbates existing inequalities and underscores the need for international intervention to restore reliable internet access and ensure freedom of information. The new cybersecurity laws further restrict access to information and will likely intensify the human rights crisis.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the internet shutdowns primarily as a human rights violation and an act of oppression by the Myanmar junta. While this is a valid perspective, the framing could benefit from a more balanced approach by acknowledging any potential justifications or counter-arguments offered by the junta (though not necessarily endorsing them). The headline and introduction strongly emphasize the negative consequences of the shutdowns. The use of words like "worst perpetrators" and "blatant disregard" sets a strong negative tone early on, which could potentially sway the reader's perception.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, emotive language to describe the junta's actions, using terms such as "draconian," "atrocities," and "weaponization of connectivity." While these terms accurately reflect the severity of the situation, they contribute to a negative portrayal of the junta. More neutral alternatives could include, for example, replacing "draconian" with "strict" or "stringent." The overall tone leans heavily toward condemnation of the junta's actions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the impact of internet shutdowns in Myanmar, but omits discussion of the broader global context of internet shutdowns and the various reasons behind them. While it mentions other countries experiencing shutdowns, it doesn't delve into the specifics or compare the situations, potentially leading to an incomplete understanding of the issue's scope. The motivations of actors other than the Myanmar junta are also mentioned but not thoroughly investigated. The article also omits details about the effectiveness of the shutdowns in achieving their stated goals, either by the Myanmar junta or other actors.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the Myanmar junta's actions and the use of Starlink as an alternative. While Starlink offers a solution, it's not accessible to everyone, and the article doesn't explore other potential solutions or mitigation strategies. This binary framing might overlook the complexities of restoring internet access in conflict zones.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. While several individuals are quoted, there's no noticeable imbalance in gender representation among the sources. However, more attention could be given to exploring the disproportionate impact of internet shutdowns on women and marginalized groups in Myanmar.
Sustainable Development Goals
The internet shutdowns in Myanmar are directly undermining peace and justice. They are used by the military junta to suppress dissent, control information, and facilitate human rights abuses, including attacks on civilians. The shutdowns prevent access to vital information about military movements and airstrikes, endangering civilians. The new cybersecurity law further restricts freedom of expression and access to information.