elpais.com
Myanmar's Civil War: Hospitals, Schools, and Churches Under Attack
In Myanmar's Kayah State, a hidden hospital treats children injured by drone and mortar attacks amidst the ongoing civil war, highlighting the military junta's disregard for civilian safety and the dire humanitarian crisis.
- What is the immediate impact of the ongoing conflict in Myanmar on civilians, particularly children?
- The conflict has caused widespread suffering, with children suffering injuries from drone and mortar attacks. At least 80,000 people, including civilians and combatants, have died since the fighting began, according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). A hidden hospital in the jungle treats around 50 patients a day, showcasing the scale of the humanitarian crisis.
- What are the long-term implications of the ongoing conflict and the military junta's actions for Myanmar's future?
- The junta's planned elections are widely seen as a facade, and the ongoing violence, coupled with the humanitarian crisis and economic collapse, suggests a bleak future. The systematic attacks on essential services and the targeting of civilians constitute war crimes, according to the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM). The long-term implications include a potential worsening of the humanitarian crisis and continued instability unless significant political change occurs.
- How have the military's actions affected healthcare access and the provision of essential services in conflict zones?
- Since the 2021 coup, the Myanmar military has consistently attacked hospitals, medical professionals, and facilities, severely weakening emergency response capabilities. At least 263 healthcare centers have been attacked, and 74 healthcare workers have been killed, according to Human Rights Watch. This has led to shortages in essential services and widespread suffering among the civilian population.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article uses a framing that emphasizes the human cost of the conflict in Myanmar, focusing on the suffering of civilians, particularly children. The descriptions of injured children in the opening paragraphs immediately evoke empathy. The repeated descriptions of attacks on hospitals, schools, and churches reinforce the narrative of civilian suffering and the junta's disregard for human life. While this framing is understandable given the subject matter, it might inadvertently overshadow other important aspects of the conflict, such as political motivations or the complexities of the various armed groups involved. The focus on the experiences of medical professionals and children creates a powerful emotional appeal, possibly influencing reader perception towards a strong condemnation of the military junta.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, aiming to describe events objectively. However, terms like "junta," "military dictatorship," and descriptions of attacks as "bombardments" and "violations of human rights" carry negative connotations. While these terms accurately reflect the situation, they contribute to a negative portrayal of the military government. The use of words like "hidden" and "clandestine" to describe the hospital adds to the sense of urgency and danger. Alternatives such as "remote" for "hidden" and "secret" for "clandestine" could lessen the emotive impact. The emotional descriptions, while evocative, might impact the perception of neutrality.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the humanitarian crisis and the suffering caused by the military junta, but offers limited insight into the perspectives of the military government or other armed groups involved in the conflict. The motivations and justifications of the junta are largely absent. While space constraints might justify this omission, providing a more balanced presentation would strengthen the article. There is limited discussion of the political complexities driving the conflict beyond broad strokes about the coup and the junta's actions. The article doesn't mention any international efforts aimed at mediating the conflict or helping the victims, except for mentioning the UN report on human rights violations. This omission leaves the reader with a somewhat incomplete understanding of the international community's involvement.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between the suffering civilians and the oppressive military junta. While this is a valid representation of the situation to a large extent, it simplifies the complexity of the conflict. There is little space dedicated to the nuances of the various ethnic groups involved, their motivations, and internal conflicts. The portrayal of the conflict as a simple struggle between good and evil might neglect the complex power dynamics at play. The article's omission of the internal dynamics of the opposition groups could lead readers to overlook potential internal contradictions or other factors influencing the conflict.
Gender Bias
The article features several female victims and mentions the role of nuns in providing spiritual support. However, there isn't an explicit focus on gendered violence, although the UN report mentioned includes violence against women. While no overt gender bias is present, the article could benefit from a more explicit discussion of how gender impacts the experience of the conflict. More information could be added about how gender roles influence access to healthcare and safety, and whether the conflict affects men and women disproportionately.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that almost half of Myanmar's population lives below the poverty line due to the ongoing conflict and economic downturn. This directly impacts SDG 1, No Poverty, by exacerbating existing poverty and pushing more people into destitution.