forbes.com
NBA Double Big Lineups: A Resurgence and Its Uncertain Future
The NBA is seeing a comeback of double big lineups, driven by versatile big men who combine size and skill; top teams utilizing this strategy are performing well, but the playoffs will determine its long-term viability.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this trend for NBA offensive and defensive strategies during the playoffs and beyond?
- The success of double big lineups this season will significantly impact future strategies. The playoffs will be a crucial test, determining if the solutions to spacing issues (e.g., offensive rebounding, cutting, zone defenses) are sustainable at a higher competitive level. This could redefine team composition and defensive strategies.
- What is the significance of the NBA's renewed interest in double big lineups, and what immediate impact does this have on team performance?
- The NBA is witnessing a resurgence of double big lineups, a strategy previously deemed outdated. This shift is driven by the emergence of skilled, versatile centers who combine size with modern offensive capabilities, leading to improved offensive efficiency for teams employing this tactic.
- How have teams addressed the traditional spacing problems associated with double big lineups, and what are the potential downsides of this approach?
- Historically, the NBA favored size, then prioritized speed and shooting. The rise of versatile big men like Nikola Jokic has reversed this trend, allowing teams to leverage both size and skill. Top teams are using double big lineups, and the top eight such combinations are found in the top eight teams in their respective conferences.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed positively towards the return of double big lineups, highlighting their success and potential while downplaying or omitting potential weaknesses. The headline and introduction emphasize the cyclical nature of trends and the comeback of double big lineups, setting a favorable tone.
Language Bias
The language used is generally positive and enthusiastic towards the resurgence of double big lineups. Terms like "reincarnation," "dynamic," and "victorious" contribute to this positive framing. While descriptive, the language isn't overtly biased; however, a more neutral tone could be achieved by using more descriptive language rather than evaluative statements.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the return of double big lineups in the NBA, but omits discussion of potential drawbacks beyond floor spacing, such as the impact on transition defense or the increased risk of turnovers from passing between two big men in the post. It also doesn't explore alternative strategies teams might employ to counter double big lineups.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by implying that the only choices are either prioritizing shooting and speed (small lineups) or utilizing double big lineups. It overlooks the possibility of hybrid lineups that balance size, skill, and spacing.
Sustainable Development Goals
The resurgence of double big lineups in basketball, featuring a blend of size and skill, could be seen as indirectly promoting reduced inequality. By valuing a wider range of player attributes beyond pure skill, it potentially opens opportunities for players with different physical attributes, reducing the dominance of a specific player archetype and promoting more diverse talent in the NBA.