Nederweert's Low-Stimulus Kermis: Inclusivity and Community

Nederweert's Low-Stimulus Kermis: Inclusivity and Community

nrc.nl

Nederweert's Low-Stimulus Kermis: Inclusivity and Community

For the fourth year, Nederweert, Netherlands, hosted a low-stimulus kermis, inviting 134 individuals from care facilities to enjoy reduced sensory input, resulting in a positive and inclusive community event.

Dutch
Netherlands
HealthArts And CultureNetherlandsCommunityDementiaInclusive EventsNederweertSensory Sensitivity
BosserhofBovakBloezem
Johanna JacobsJorik FranssenPierre SwinkelsHarold Van Der HaarAtze Lubach-KoersYounesDavinoIngrid Van KatwijkZenta Konings
What are the potential long-term implications of this model?
The success of Nederweert's low-stimulus kermis showcases a model for inclusive community events adaptable to various settings and demographics. This approach may inspire similar initiatives, potentially normalizing sensory-sensitive options across entertainment and community events, benefiting broader segments of the population in the future.
What is the primary impact of Nederweert's low-stimulus kermis?
The kermis fosters inclusivity by providing a sensory-friendly environment for individuals with advanced dementia and other sensory sensitivities, enabling them to participate in a community event. This contrasts with traditional kermises, which can be overwhelming for this group. The event has grown from 25 attendees to 134 in four years.
How has the initiative impacted the broader community and the kermis industry?
The initiative has expanded beyond its initial target group; it's become popular among people seeking a calmer experience. Nationally, the model is increasingly adopted, although few large-scale kermises implement it for a full day due to revenue concerns. Nederweert's success demonstrates that social inclusivity and financial viability can coexist.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article presents a largely positive framing of the low-stimulus carnival, highlighting its success and the positive experiences of participants. While it mentions the initial skepticism and the potential loss of revenue for a full-day low-stimulus event, the overall tone emphasizes the benefits and widespread adoption of the initiative. The headline, if included, would likely further reinforce this positive framing.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. However, phrases like "stralende gezichten" (shining faces) and descriptions of enjoyment lean towards a positive portrayal. There's no overtly loaded language, but the selection of quotes and anecdotes reinforces the positive aspects of the event.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the positive aspects of the low-stimulus carnival and its impact on participants with sensory sensitivities. While it mentions the potential loss of revenue for a full-day event, it doesn't delve into potential downsides or criticisms. It also doesn't explore alternative approaches to inclusivity in carnival settings in detail. This omission might provide a less complete picture.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Positive
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a prikkelarme (low-stimulus) kermis (funfair) designed for people with dementia and other sensory sensitivities. This initiative promotes their well-being by providing a safe and enjoyable environment that caters to their specific needs. The event