nrc.nl
Netherlands: Surge in Intimidation and Aggression Against Local Politicians
A recent survey reveals that 45% of local politicians in the Netherlands experienced intimidation or aggression in the past year, a near doubling compared to ten years ago; most threats are online, and women are disproportionately affected, with many adjusting political ambitions due to the lack of effective government response.
- What are the immediate consequences of the substantial increase in intimidation and aggression against local politicians in the Netherlands?
- In the past year, 45% of local politicians in the Netherlands experienced intimidation or aggression, nearly double the rate of a decade ago. This is based on a recent Ipsos I&O survey of mayors, provincial council members, council members, and water board members. While the total number of reported incidents decreased slightly compared to two years prior, the increase in personal attacks is alarming.
- How do the types and targets of aggression against local politicians differ, and what factors contribute to the disproportionate impact on women?
- The increase in aggression against politicians is largely driven by online threats (59%), with a notable shift towards personal attacks targeting characteristics like gender, origin, and sexual orientation. This personal targeting is reflected in the fact that women are disproportionately affected, with a quarter adjusting their political ambitions due to intimidation.
- What systemic changes are needed to effectively address the rise in online hate and intimidation targeting local politicians, and what role should the government play in providing support and accountability?
- The insufficient response from local governments, which primarily offer advice on social media use, highlights a critical need for proactive measures. Minister Uitermark's planned action plan against online hate is a step in the right direction, but the reluctance of victims to report incidents due to perceived inaction underscores the need for effective enforcement and support systems.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity of the problem and the minister's response. The headline (if there was one) and introduction likely highlight the alarming increase in intimidation and aggression. While this is important, a more balanced framing might also explore preventative measures or positive initiatives already underway.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the statistics and the minister's response, but omits details on the types of support available to local politicians facing intimidation and aggression. It also doesn't delve into potential underlying causes of the increase in aggression, such as societal polarization or the role of online echo chambers. While acknowledging that the article is limited by space constraints, the lack of information on support systems and root causes could limit a reader's understanding of the issue and hinder the formation of comprehensive solutions.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from exploring a wider range of potential solutions beyond the minister's proposed "stappenplan". The focus on reporting and potential legal action might overshadow other preventative strategies.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant increase in intimidation and aggression against local politicians in the Netherlands, impacting their ability to function effectively and undermining democratic processes. This directly relates to SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels. The violence and intimidation described undermine these goals.