dw.com
Nicaragua Swears in Thousands of Hooded "Volunteer Police" Amidst Reform Controversy
Thousands of hooded civilians were sworn in as Nicaragua's new "volunteer police," a controversial force created by a constitutional reform and criticized as paramilitary by exiled opposition, reminiscent of the 2018 protests' repression.
- What is the immediate impact of the Nicaraguan government's creation of a "volunteer police" force?
- Thousands of Nicaraguan civilians, faces covered by black hoods, were sworn in as "volunteer police" by authorities. This controversial force, part of a constitutional reform, is labeled as "paramilitary" by exiled opposition. Around 2,500 volunteers, dressed in white shirts and black pants, took oaths in Estelí and Madriz provinces.
- How does the creation of this "volunteer police" relate to past instances of government repression in Nicaragua?
- The creation of this "volunteer police" is directly linked to a constitutional reform passed in November, expanding presidential terms and granting the vice president equal power to the president. The opposition views this as a further consolidation of power by President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Rosario Murillo. This new force is reminiscent of the hooded, armed groups that violently suppressed protests in 2018, which left over 300 dead according to the UN.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this constitutional reform on human rights and political stability in Nicaragua?
- The ongoing juramentation of the "volunteer police" signals a deepening of authoritarian trends in Nicaragua. The lack of legal framework, along with the force's resemblance to the 2018 paramilitary groups, suggests continued repression and potential for further human rights violations. This move raises concerns about the upcoming elections and the future political landscape in Nicaragua.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative largely from the perspective of the opposition and exiled Nicaraguan media. Headlines in exile media are cited, emphasizing their negative portrayal of the volunteer police force. While the government's statements are included, they are presented within the context of the opposition's accusations, potentially swaying the reader towards a negative view.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language, such as describing the volunteers as 'encapuchados' (hooded), which carries a negative connotation associated with secrecy and potentially illicit activities. The use of terms like 'paramilitary' and 'represivo' (repressive) also contributes to a negative portrayal of the situation. Neutral alternatives could include 'masked' instead of 'encapuchados', and more descriptive terms such as 'controversial' or 'controverted' rather than 'paramilitary' and 'repressive'.
Bias by Omission
The article omits mention of the government's perspective on the accusations of creating paramilitary forces. It also doesn't include details on the vetting process for these volunteer police officers, or statistics on their activities post-swearing in. The lack of information about the government's justification for this action limits a complete understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by portraying the volunteer police force as either 'heroic' (according to the government) or 'paramilitary' (according to the opposition), neglecting the possibility of a more nuanced reality. This simplifies a complex issue and limits the reader's ability to form an independent judgment.
Sustainable Development Goals
The creation of a volunteer police force, characterized by opponents as paramilitary, raises concerns about human rights abuses and due process. The lack of transparency and accountability in its formation, alongside its potential use in suppressing dissent, directly undermines the principles of justice and strong institutions. The historical context of its deployment against protestors in 2018 further amplifies these concerns.