dw.com
Nicaragua's Ortega Consolidates Power Through Constitutional Reform
Nicaragua's parliament ratified a constitutional reform on January 30, 2025, granting President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Rosario Murillo, absolute control over the state and civil society, extending Ortega's term until 2028 and establishing Nicaragua as a "revolutionary" and "socialist" state.
- How does the constitutional reform address the role of the media, the Church, and private businesses in Nicaragua?
- This reform, passed unanimously by the FSLN-dominated Congress, designates Nicaragua as a "revolutionary" and "socialist" state, integrating the FSLN flag into national symbols. The changes effectively eliminate the independence of legislative, judicial, and electoral branches, concentrating power in the presidential couple.
- What are the immediate consequences of Nicaragua's constitutional changes for the separation of powers and civil liberties?
- Nicaragua's constitutional reform, ratified on January 30, 2025, grants President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Rosario Murillo, absolute control over all state powers and civil society. Murillo's title is elevated from Vice President to "co-president", extending Ortega's rule until 2028.
- What are the long-term implications of the creation of a "Volunteer Police" for the stability and human rights situation in Nicaragua?
- The reform establishes state surveillance of the press and the Church to prevent actions perceived as aligned with "foreign interests," and formalizes the stripping of Nicaraguan nationality from those deemed "traitors." The creation of a "Volunteer Police," composed of civilians, raises concerns about potential future repression, echoing the events of the 2018 protests.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's headline and introduction frame the constitutional changes as a consolidation of power by Ortega and Murillo. While factually accurate, this framing emphasizes the negative consequences and gives less attention to any potential positive outcomes presented by the government. The use of terms like "consolidated their absolute rule" and "dictatorship" sets a negative tone from the outset.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, negative language when describing the government's actions, such as "absolute rule," "dictatorship," and "repression." While these words accurately reflect the views of many, they could be considered loaded and might influence reader perceptions. More neutral terms could include "consolidation of power," "authoritarian rule," and "crackdown." The repeated use of quotes from critics further reinforces a negative narrative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the government's perspective and actions, giving less weight to the views and experiences of opposition groups and civil society. While the concerns of international human rights organizations are mentioned, a more balanced presentation would include in-depth accounts from Nicaraguan citizens who oppose the government's actions. The omission of diverse voices limits the reader's understanding of the situation's complexity.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between the government's claim of a strengthened democracy and the opposition's view of a dictatorship. The reality is likely far more nuanced, with various actors and perspectives not fully represented. The framing of Nicaragua as either a 'democracy' or a 'dictatorship' oversimplifies a complex political landscape.
Gender Bias
While both Ortega and Murillo are mentioned prominently, the article doesn't explicitly analyze gender dynamics in their power-sharing arrangement. A more thorough analysis would explore whether Murillo's role is genuinely equal or if it reinforces traditional gender roles within a patriarchal power structure. The description of their ages might be considered unnecessary.
Sustainable Development Goals
The constitutional reforms in Nicaragua concentrate power in the hands of President Ortega and Vice President Murillo, undermining democratic institutions and the rule of law. The suppression of dissent, the targeting of opposition figures, and the creation of a volunteer police force all contribute to a climate of fear and repression, directly contradicting the principles of peace, justice, and strong institutions. The UN Human Rights Office has expressed deep concern over these developments.