lexpress.fr
North Korea's Cryptocurrency Heists Hit Record High in 2024
North Korea stole $1.34 billion in cryptocurrency in 2024, significantly up from $660 million in 2023, funding its weapons programs and deepening its ties with Russia, raising global security concerns.
- What is the significance of North Korea's cryptocurrency theft in 2024, and what are its immediate global implications?
- In 2024, North Korea stole $1.34 billion in cryptocurrency, significantly more than the $660 million stolen in 2023, making it the leading perpetrator of cryptocurrency theft globally. This funding is used to support the country's weapons programs, with the White House claiming that half of North Korea's missile program is financed by cyberattacks and cryptocurrency theft.
- How are North Korean hackers infiltrating cryptocurrency companies, and what measures can be taken to mitigate this risk?
- North Korea's cryptocurrency theft is directly linked to its weapons programs and increasingly close ties with Russia. The increased frequency and success of these thefts, rising from 20 successful hacks in 2023 to 47 in 2024, indicate a sophisticated and well-resourced operation.
- What are the long-term implications of North Korea's growing reliance on cryptocurrency theft for funding its weapons programs and its collaboration with Russia?
- The acceleration of North Korea's cryptocurrency heists, with the time between large-scale thefts decreasing dramatically, poses a serious threat. The infiltration of cryptocurrency companies by North Korean operatives, often under false pretenses, highlights the need for stronger security measures within the industry. This situation, combined with North Korea's military support for Russia, significantly increases global instability.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately establish a negative tone, focusing on North Korea's cryptocurrency theft as a significant threat. The article consistently emphasizes the scale of the thefts and the potential dangers, using strong language like "treasure," "chaos," and "allumette qui déclenche un chaos mondial." This framing prioritizes the negative aspects of North Korea's actions and potentially exaggerates their impact.
Language Bias
The article employs charged language like "volé" (stolen), "dérobés" (robbed), and "butin" (loot), which carry negative connotations. Phrases like "la Corée du Nord pourrait être l'allumette qui déclenche un chaos mondial" (North Korea could be the match that ignites global chaos) are alarmist. More neutral alternatives could include "acquired," "obtained," and using less hyperbolic language to describe the potential consequences.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative actions of North Korea, potentially omitting any positive contributions or mitigating factors. While it mentions UN warnings about the use of stolen cryptocurrency for weapons programs, it doesn't explore alternative explanations for North Korea's actions or potential motivations beyond simple malevolence. The article also lacks details on the scale of the cryptocurrency market and the percentage of thefts attributable to North Korea relative to other actors.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic 'us vs. them' narrative, portraying North Korea as solely responsible for the cryptocurrency thefts and framing their actions as unequivocally malicious. It doesn't explore the complexities of international relations or the possibility of other actors being involved or influencing the situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights North Korea's significant involvement in cryptocurrency theft, using the stolen funds to support its weapons programs and potentially destabilizing regional security. This directly undermines international peace and security, challenging the rule of law and threatening global stability. The connection to Russia further exacerbates this negative impact.