dw.com
North Korea's Extensive Military Aid to Russia in Ukraine War
North Korea supplied Russia with 4 to 6 million artillery shells between September 2023 and March 2025, supporting Russia's war in Ukraine; this was confirmed by a joint investigation involving Reuters and the Open Source Centre, which tracked 64 shipments using various methods.
- How did the North Korean military supplies reach Russia, and what methods were used to verify the supply routes?
- The OSC investigation revealed that Russian artillery units sometimes relied almost entirely on North Korean ammunition. This substantial contribution, estimated at 70% of Russia's artillery supply, supplemented Russia's domestic production of 2-2.3 million shells in 2024. The shipments were confirmed using intercepted communications, satellite imagery, and social media videos.
- What is the extent of North Korea's military support to Russia's war in Ukraine, and what are the immediate implications?
- From September 2023 to March 2025, North Korea supplied Russia with 4 to 6 million artillery shells, according to a joint investigation by Reuters and the Open Source Centre (OSC). This significant transfer, tracked via 64 shipments involving 16,000 containers, directly aided Russia's war effort in Ukraine.
- What are the long-term implications of North Korea's military and logistical support for Russia's war effort, and what are the potential risks for North Korea?
- North Korea's military support extended beyond ammunition. South Korea, Ukraine, and the US estimate that approximately 10,000 North Korean troops were deployed to the Kursk region bordering Ukraine by October 2024, with 4,000 possibly killed or wounded by early 2025. Further deployments of 3,000 troops occurred in early 2025.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the scale and impact of North Korean military aid to Russia, potentially exaggerating its significance in the overall conflict. The headline (if there was one) and introduction likely highlight the sheer number of shells supplied, thereby creating a sense of urgency and potentially focusing attention on this aspect disproportionately.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, with specific figures and factual details dominating the narrative. However, phrases like "practically fully depended" and descriptions of losses as "large" could be considered slightly loaded, subtly emphasizing the impact of North Korean involvement. More neutral alternatives would be 'largely reliant' and 'substantial'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the supply of artillery shells from North Korea to Russia, but omits discussion of other forms of military aid or support that North Korea might be providing. It also doesn't explore the potential motivations behind North Korea's actions beyond providing a statement about the contribution to Russian artillery supplies. There is no discussion of the economic impact of this supply on North Korea or the international implications beyond sanctions on the shipping companies.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the situation by focusing primarily on the quantitative aspects of the artillery shell supply without delving into the complexities of the geopolitical dynamics involved. The narrative doesn't fully explore the range of potential consequences of these actions or alternative explanations for North Korea's involvement.
Sustainable Development Goals
The supply of ammunition from North Korea to Russia significantly prolongs the war in Ukraine, undermining peace and security in the region. The involvement of North Korea destabilizes the international order and violates international norms against supplying weapons to a country engaged in an aggressive war.