dw.com
North Macedonia: Minimum Living Costs Rise Despite Government Price Controls
The minimum living cost for a four-member family in North Macedonia increased by 391 denars in January 2024, reaching 63,252 denars, despite a government initiative to lower prices; the Trade Union of Macedonia (SSM) claims this indicates inflation is above 10 percent, far exceeding the official rate of 3.5 percent.
- How do the price changes of essential goods, such as wheat and bread, reflect the effectiveness of the government's intervention to control inflation?
- The 10.65 percent year-over-year increase in the minimum cost of living basket, totaling 6,089 denars, contradicts the official inflation rate of 3.5 percent. The Trade Union of Macedonia (SSM) argues that the actual inflation is above 10 percent, citing continued high prices despite falling global commodity prices like wheat.
- What are the long-term implications of the alleged price manipulation by retailers, and what measures could be taken to ensure fair pricing for consumers?
- The SSM alleges that retailers are exploiting consumers, raising prices despite falling global commodity prices. They cite the minimal price decrease of bread (1 denar) compared to the 13.6 percent decrease in global wheat prices, suggesting that the government's price control measures have been ineffective and that retailers will likely maintain inflated prices.
- What is the discrepancy between the official inflation rate and the increase in the minimum cost of living in North Macedonia, and what are the immediate consequences for consumers?
- In January 2024, the minimum cost of living for a four-member family in North Macedonia increased by 391 denars compared to December, reaching 63,252 denars. Food and beverage costs alone rose 10.43 percent year-over-year and 123 denars in the last month, despite a government initiative to lower prices.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing heavily favors the perspective of the trade union leader, presenting his claims and accusations without significant counterarguments or alternative viewpoints. The headline (if one were to be created from this text) could reinforce this bias by highlighting the union's concerns and accusations. The use of quotes from the union leader dominates the narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is strongly biased. Terms like "greedy merchants," "alчни трговци" (translated as 'greedy merchants'), and accusations of merchants enriching themselves "на грбот на работниците" ('at the expense of workers') are emotionally charged and lack neutrality. More neutral alternatives would include phrases like 'retailers' or 'businesses,' and describing the price increase as a matter of economic factors rather than greed.
Bias by Omission
The analysis lacks information on the government's perspective regarding the price increases and the effectiveness of the New Year's basket measure. It also omits data from official sources on inflation rates, relying solely on the union's calculations. The impact of external factors like global commodity prices on the cost of living is not fully explored.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a false dichotomy by portraying a conflict between 'greedy merchants' and consumers, ignoring the complexities of supply chains, production costs, and other factors that influence prices. The suggestion that price stability is solely dependent on the willingness of merchants to lower prices simplifies a complex issue.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant increase in the minimum cost of living for a four-member family in North Macedonia, indicating a worsening of poverty and economic hardship. The 10.43% increase in food and beverage costs over one year, coupled with the union's estimate of inflation exceeding 10%, directly impacts the ability of low-income households to meet their basic needs, thus hindering progress towards poverty reduction. The quote regarding the 20% increase in the cost of the consumer basket further emphasizes the severity of the situation.