![North Macedonia's Central Registry Faces Audit Scrutiny Over Financial Irregularities](/img/article-image-placeholder.webp)
dw.com
North Macedonia's Central Registry Faces Audit Scrutiny Over Financial Irregularities
An audit of North Macedonia's Central Registry revealed significant financial irregularities, including unused furniture purchases, unutilized renovations, and an unpaid loan, along with numerous legal challenges and internal control weaknesses.
- What are the most significant financial irregularities and operational inefficiencies identified in the Central Registry's recent audit?
- In July 2019, the Central Registry purchased 6.4 million denars worth of furniture; 1.3 million denars worth remains unused after five years, prompting auditors to question the purchase's necessity. This is one of several operational weaknesses.
- How did the Central Registry's spending practices during the pandemic contradict government guidelines, and what are the consequences of these actions?
- The Central Registry increased spending by over 15 million denars on renovations during the pandemic, despite government recommendations for cost reduction. Completed renovations in several locations remain unused, highlighting inefficient resource allocation.
- What are the potential long-term financial and operational risks posed by the Central Registry's outstanding loan, ongoing lawsuits, and internal control deficiencies?
- The Central Registry faces legal challenges, including 38 lawsuits, and carries an outstanding 1.4 million euro loan from 2007 that remains unpaid. These issues, coupled with internal control weaknesses, pose significant financial and operational risks.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative heavily emphasizes the negative findings of the audit, framing the Central Register as an institution with significant mismanagement and financial irregularities. The headline (if one were to be written based on this report) would likely highlight these issues, potentially creating a negative public perception.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, reporting on the audit findings. However, phrases like "слабости во работењето" (weaknesses in operation) and "несогласености" (inconsistencies) carry a slightly negative connotation. More neutral alternatives could include "areas for improvement" and "discrepancies.
Bias by Omission
The analysis lacks information on the Central Register's response to the audit findings and any corrective actions taken. It also omits details about the specific types of furniture purchased and the reasons given for the purchase. Further, there is no mention of the overall budget of the Central Register, making it difficult to assess the significance of the financial irregularities.
False Dichotomy
The report doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it focuses heavily on the negative aspects of the Central Register's performance without balancing it with any potential positive contributions or mitigating factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights inefficient procurement practices in Central Register, where 1.3 million denars worth of furniture remained unused for five years. This demonstrates irresponsible resource management and a lack of planning, contradicting sustainable consumption and production principles. Further, the increase in spending during a pandemic for construction and renovations without subsequent use is another example of unsustainable resource use.