zeit.de
North Rhine-Westphalia Court Appointment Scandal
Controversy surrounds the appointment of the head of North Rhine-Westphalia's Higher Administrative Court, with allegations of procedural errors and political favoritism prompting investigations.
German
Germany
PoliticsGermany InvestigationControversyLaw
North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative CourtFederal Constitutional CourtNrw-JustizministeriumInnenministerium
Benjamin LimbachDaniela Lesmeister
- What role did the administrative courts play in this case?
- Two administrative courts halted the appointment process, with one court in Münster sharply criticizing the procedure as manipulative. The Higher Administrative Court initially saw no major concerns but was later instructed by the Federal Constitutional Court to re-examine the case.
- What is the focus of the ongoing parliamentary investigation?
- A parliamentary committee is investigating allegations of cronyism and political favoritism in the selection process, examining whether competence or political connections influenced the decision.
- What were the conclusions of the expert's report commissioned by the opposition?
- An expert commissioned by the opposition concluded that the candidate's evaluation was unlawful, leading to the halting of the appointment. The investigation will determine if the successful candidate's promotion bypassed her male competitors due to these potential procedural irregularities.
- What is the planned action of Justice Minister Benjamin Limbach regarding this matter?
- North Rhine-Westphalia's Justice Minister, Benjamin Limbach, will address the press to discuss further steps regarding the appointment. The evaluation of the initially successful female candidate was overturned due to potential procedural errors.
- What was the main reason for the halt in the appointment of the head of the North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative Court?
- The appointment of the head of the North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative Court was stopped by the Federal Constitutional Court due to potential procedural errors in the evaluation of the successful female candidate.