Northern Lights Dim After Intense Spring and Autumn Displays

Northern Lights Dim After Intense Spring and Autumn Displays

forbes.com

Northern Lights Dim After Intense Spring and Autumn Displays

The dramatic Northern Lights displays of May and October 2024, visible in the central U.S., have decreased due to a decline in solar activity following intense solar flares and coronal mass ejections, despite the sun being in its solar maximum phase; the next period of intense activity is expected around the March 2025 equinox.

English
United States
OtherScienceAurora BorealisNorthern LightsSolar MaximumGeomagnetic StormsRussell-Mcpherron Effect
NasaNoaaUcla
When can we expect another period of intense auroral activity, and what factors will contribute to its intensity?
While the sun is in its solar maximum, meaning more frequent solar flares are possible, the current quiet period is temporary. Intense auroral displays are likely to return around the March 2025 equinox, when the Russell-McPherron effect again enhances solar wind penetration of Earth's magnetosphere. Until then, viewing opportunities are limited except at high northern latitudes.
How does the Russell-McPherron effect, and the position of Earth relative to the sun, influence the intensity of the aurora borealis?
The reduced auroral activity is linked to the natural ebb and flow of solar storms and the Russell-McPherron effect. This effect, strongest around the equinoxes, explains the peak activity in March/September. The current decline is expected as Earth moves away from the September equinox and toward the December solstice.
What caused the recent decrease in the intensity and visibility of the Northern Lights after the intense displays in May and October 2024?
The intense Northern Lights displays of May and October 2024, visible as far south as the central U.S., have subsided. This is due to a recent decline in solar activity, despite the sun being in its solar maximum phase. The displays were fueled by intense solar flares and coronal mass ejections, but this surge has decreased, resulting in less geomagnetic activity.

Cognitive Concepts

1/5

Framing Bias

The framing is generally neutral. The article presents a balanced view of the scientific explanations behind the aurora displays, acknowledging both the solar maximum and the Russell-McPherron effect. The headline could be slightly more neutral, avoiding words like "Where did the Northern Lights go?", which might imply a sense of mystery or loss.

2/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the reasons for the decrease in aurora sightings, but it could benefit from mentioning other factors that might influence aurora visibility, such as weather conditions (cloud cover) and light pollution. While acknowledging limitations of scope is mentioned in the guidelines, explicitly stating these limitations would improve transparency.

Sustainable Development Goals

Climate Action Positive
Indirect Relevance

The article discusses solar activity and its impact on the Aurora Borealis. Understanding solar cycles and their effects on Earth's magnetosphere is crucial for predicting space weather and mitigating potential disruptions to technology and infrastructure. This aligns with SDG 13 (Climate Action) which aims to take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. While not directly addressing climate change itself, studying solar activity contributes to a better understanding of Earth's climate system and potential space weather events that could indirectly affect climate.