kathimerini.gr

Norway Ranked World's Wealthiest in 2025 by Composite Economic Index

The Economist's 2025 ranking determines Norway as the wealthiest country, considering GDP per capita adjusted for purchasing power and working hours; Switzerland leads in nominal GDP per capita, while Singapore tops the list when considering only purchasing power parity; the ranking excludes Luxembourg and Ireland due to data inconsistencies.

Read original article in Greek

Greek

Greece

International RelationsEconomySwitzerlandNorwayGdpSingaporeGlobal WealthEconomic RankingPpp

The Economist

What country is ranked as the wealthiest globally in 2025 by the Economist's report when considering a composite index accounting for purchasing power and working hours?: According to the Economist's 2025 ranking, Norway is the wealthiest country when considering GDP per capita adjusted for both purchasing power and working hours. Switzerland has the highest nominal GDP per capita, exceeding \$100,000 annually, but its high cost of living significantly impacts purchasing power. Singapore leads in GDP per capita adjusted for cost of living differences.
How do the rankings differ when using nominal GDP per capita versus GDP per capita adjusted for cost of living and working hours, and what factors contribute to these differences?: The ranking uses three indicators: nominal GDP per capita, GDP adjusted for cost of living (PPP), and GDP adjusted for both price and working hours. This methodology accounts for variations in cost of living and working hours across countries, providing a more nuanced view of wealth than nominal GDP alone. The inclusion of working hours factors in the amount of time worked to generate income, influencing the overall wealth ranking.
What are some limitations of the Economist's methodology, and what additional factors could be considered in future analyses to provide a more complete picture of national wealth?: The significant differences in rankings based on different metrics highlight the complexities of defining and measuring national wealth. Factors such as cost of living, working hours, and demographic composition significantly impact the results. Future research could consider additional factors like income inequality and wealth distribution for a more comprehensive assessment.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The framing emphasizes the complexity of defining 'richest country,' which is fair, but the repeated highlighting of Norway's top ranking in the most complex metric could subtly bias readers towards accepting this as the 'definitive' measure. The inclusion of the US's rankings in all three metrics, and Britain's low rankings, also influences perception.

1/5

Language Bias

The language is largely neutral and descriptive. However, phrases like 'explosive growth' in relation to Guyana's oil revenues could be considered slightly loaded, potentially implying a positive connotation that might not fully reflect the complex implications of such rapid economic change.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The analysis omits discussion of wealth inequality within each country, focusing primarily on aggregate national metrics. It also excludes Luxembourg and Ireland due to data complexities, potentially omitting relevant perspectives on national wealth.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that only one country can be the 'richest,' when the reality is far more nuanced, depending on the metric used.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article notes that low female labor participation in countries like Saudi Arabia and Turkey skews the 'income per hour worked' metric. This acknowledges a gender bias in the underlying data, but doesn't further analyze how gender inequality impacts broader wealth distribution.

Sustainable Development Goals

Reduced Inequality Positive

Indirect Relevance

The article highlights the methodology used to calculate wealth, considering factors like cost of living and working hours. This approach implicitly acknowledges the need for a more nuanced understanding of wealth distribution beyond simple GDP per capita, which is crucial for addressing inequalities. The inclusion of working hours in the calculation also indirectly considers the potential impacts of labor market disparities and access to economic opportunities. The comparison of different countries

Jul 23, 04:12

Trump Announces U.S.-Japan Trade Deal with 15% Tariff

Former President Trump announced a trade deal with Japan, imposing a 15% tariff on Japanese imports in exchange for a $550 billion Japanese investment in the U.S. and increased market access for U.S. goods, a deal that has not been publicly commented upon by the Japanese government.

Jul 23, 01:11

Greek ETF Investment Yields 109.2% Gain

The Contra the Heard Investment Newsletter details its successful investment in the Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK-A), realizing a 109.2% gain after holding the position since October 2015, highlighting Greece's economic recovery and its strategy of global diversification.

Jul 23, 01:12

GM Q2 Earnings Reveal $1.1 Billion Tariff Impact, Share Price Plunges

General Motors' Q2 2025 earnings revealed a $1.1 billion net tariff cost, resulting in a 35.4% year-over-year decrease in net income and an 8.12% drop in share price on July 22nd, highlighting the substantial financial impact of tariffs on the automaker.

Jul 23, 01:12

Rotterdam Port reports lowest goods handling in 15 years

The Port of Rotterdam handled 211 million tons of goods in the first half of 2025, a 4.1% decrease compared to previous years, primarily due to weak German industry, Red Sea shipping disruptions, and economic uncertainties; coal imports dropped by 21.1%, while container numbers increased by 2.7%, mostly empty export containers.