nrc.nl
NS Improves Train Service Despite Poor European Ranking
NS implemented its largest timetable change in years, adding 1600 weekly trains, improving frequency on popular routes, but a recent report ranks NS poorly against European counterparts on price, passenger experience and affordable fares.
- What are the immediate impacts of NS's new timetable on Dutch train travel?
- NS, the Dutch national railway company, is implementing its largest timetable change in years, adding 1,600 weekly trains to reach 27,600. This includes increased frequency on popular routes like Amsterdam-Schiphol and improved service between major cities. However, a recent report ranks NS poorly compared to European counterparts.
- How does NS's performance compare to other European railway companies, and what accounts for the differences?
- Despite service improvements, NS received a low ranking (23/27) in a Transport & Environment (T&E) report, scoring poorly on price, passenger experience, and affordable fares. This contrasts with the increased train frequency, highlighting a disconnect between operational expansion and passenger satisfaction.
- What are the long-term implications of NS's current trajectory regarding passenger satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and environmental goals?
- NS faces challenges in improving passenger satisfaction and competitiveness. Raising ticket prices by 6% in 2025 and high kilometer costs compared to European peers (17 cents vs. 3-5 cents) could exacerbate existing issues and hinder efforts to attract passengers from cars and planes. Improved pricing strategies, better compensation for delays, and more affordable fares are necessary.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's headline and introduction immediately highlight the NS's low ranking in the T&E report, setting a negative tone from the outset. The positive aspects of the new train schedule are mentioned but receive less emphasis compared to the criticisms. The placement of the positive news at the beginning and the negative news later on also impacts the reader's perception.
Language Bias
The article uses words like "slecht" (bad), "teleur" (disappoint), and "dure" (expensive) to describe the NS, creating a negative connotation. While these words accurately reflect the findings of the report, the repeated use of such strong negative terms influences the overall tone. More neutral language could be used to balance the reporting.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the NS's shortcomings based on the T&E report but provides limited context on NS's investments, improvements, or potential mitigating factors. While the negative aspects are well-documented, a balanced perspective would include information about NS's efforts to address these issues. The article also omits detailed breakdowns of the specific metrics used by T&E in their ranking, which would enable a more thorough evaluation of NS's performance.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by portraying the choice between train and plane travel as a simple cost comparison, ignoring other factors like travel time, environmental impact, and convenience. It also implies that higher ticket prices are solely the fault of the train companies, neglecting the influence of government regulations and infrastructure costs.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses improvements to the Dutch railway system, increasing the number of trains and improving frequency, which contributes to reducing traffic congestion and promoting sustainable urban transport. More frequent and reliable train service can encourage people to shift from cars to trains, reducing carbon emissions and improving air quality in cities.