NTSB: Pilot Error Caused Severe Turbulence on Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35

NTSB: Pilot Error Caused Severe Turbulence on Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35

cnn.com

NTSB: Pilot Error Caused Severe Turbulence on Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35

On February 27, 2022, Hawaiian Airlines flight 35 from Phoenix to Honolulu encountered severe turbulence near Kahului, Hawaii, injuring 36 passengers due to the flight crew's decision to fly through a known storm cell despite weather warnings; the NTSB cited this decision as the probable cause.

English
United States
OtherTransportAir Travel SafetyPilot ErrorTurbulenceNtsb ReportHawaiian Airlines
Hawaiian AirlinesNational Transportation Safety Board (Ntsb)National Weather ServiceHonolulu Emergency Medical Services
None Explicitly Named
How did the pilots' decision to fly through the storm cell, despite weather warnings, contribute to the incident's severity and outcome?
The incident highlights the risks associated with pilots' decisions to navigate severe weather. The NTSB's findings underscore the importance of pilot training and adherence to safety protocols when navigating potentially hazardous weather conditions. Pre-flight awareness of adverse weather conditions and alternative flight path considerations are critical for mitigating risks.
What improvements to pilot training, communication protocols, and weather forecasting systems could help prevent similar incidents in the future?
This incident underscores the need for enhanced pilot training in severe weather avoidance and improved communication protocols between flight crews and cabin staff during emergencies. Further investigation into similar incidents and analysis of weather forecasting data might improve safety protocols and minimize future occurrences of severe turbulence.
What were the key factors contributing to the severe turbulence encountered by Hawaiian Airlines flight 35, resulting in numerous passenger injuries?
On February 27, 2022, Hawaiian Airlines flight 35 encountered severe turbulence near Kahului, Hawaii, injuring 36 passengers, 20 of whom required hospitalization. The NTSB final report attributes the incident to the pilots' decision to fly through a known storm cell, despite weather warnings indicating potential turbulence.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The narrative emphasizes the severity of the turbulence and the resulting passenger injuries, creating a strong emotional impact. The headline and repeated descriptions of the 'hard jolt', 'free fall', and 'two hard hits' shape the reader's perception of the incident as exceptionally dangerous and the pilots' decision as reckless. The focus on passenger accounts further strengthens this framing, making the pilots appear culpable.

3/5

Language Bias

The language used to describe the turbulence is highly charged. Terms like 'plume' of bad weather, 'hard jolt', 'free fall', and 'two hard hits' create a sense of drama and danger that goes beyond neutral reporting. The descriptions of passengers being 'thrown' and a passenger 'flying' face-first into a ceiling add to this effect. While these are descriptive, they verge on sensationalism. More neutral alternatives could include phrases such as 'unexpected weather event', 'sudden deceleration', 'significant turbulence', etc.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the passenger experience and the NTSB report, but doesn't include perspectives from the pilots beyond their recorded statements. It also omits any discussion of the airline's response to the incident or subsequent changes in safety protocols. While space constraints may justify some omissions, including pilot perspectives beyond the factual report would provide a more balanced view.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article implicitly presents a false dichotomy by emphasizing the pilots' decision as the sole cause of the incident, without exploring other contributing factors such as weather forecasting limitations or potential equipment malfunctions. This simplistic framing might oversimplify a complex event.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article doesn't exhibit significant gender bias. While it mentions a female passenger's experience in detail, it does not focus disproportionately on gender in its descriptions of injuries or responses.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The severe turbulence caused numerous injuries to passengers and crew, including a serious head injury, lacerations, bruising, and loss of consciousness. This directly impacts the SDG target of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages.