
lexpress.fr
OECD Raises 2025 Global Growth Forecast Despite Trade War Headwinds
The OECD upwardly revised its 2025 global growth forecast to 3.2 percent, citing unexpected resilience to trade tariffs, but warned of future negative effects and slower growth in the US and Eurozone.
- What are the potential long-term consequences and warning signs highlighted in the OECD report?
- The OECD notes that the full effects of tariff increases haven't been felt yet and that a slowdown in production growth is already apparent in some countries (South Korea, Germany, Brazil). Furthermore, the report highlights slowing consumption in the US, Eurozone, and China, and anticipates higher inflation, particularly in the US. The report emphasizes the need for fiscal discipline, particularly in France.
- How will the trade war impact the US and Eurozone economies according to the OECD's projections?
- The OECD projects US growth to slow to 1.8 percent in 2025 and 1.5 percent in 2026, down from 2.8 percent in 2024, due to the trade war. For the Eurozone, growth is projected at 1.2 percent in 2025 (a slight increase from previous forecasts) and 1.0 percent in 2026 (a decrease). France is urged to exercise fiscal prudence.
- What is the OECD's revised global growth forecast for 2025, and what factors contributed to this revision?
- The OECD raised its 2025 global growth forecast to 3.2 percent from a previous projection of 2.9 percent. This upward revision is attributed to the delayed impact of higher tariffs on production and trade, allowing for better-than-expected economic performance in the first half of the year.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view by including both positive and negative aspects of the global economic outlook. While it highlights the OECD's upward revision of global growth projections for 2025, it also emphasizes potential negative consequences and a slowdown in certain sectors. The inclusion of both optimistic (increased industrial production) and pessimistic (slowdown in production growth since August in several countries) factors prevents a one-sided narrative. However, the prominence given to the OECD's revised growth projections in the headline and introduction might subtly suggest a more optimistic outlook than warranted.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. The article uses factual data and quotes from the OECD's chief economist to support its claims. There is no evidence of loaded language or emotionally charged terms. The use of phrases like "a little more rosy than expected" and "a little higher inflation" indicates a degree of cautious optimism without being overtly biased.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from a more detailed analysis of the specific sectors or industries most affected by the trade war and tariffs. While it mentions a slowdown in production growth in specific countries, a deeper dive into the regional or sectoral impacts would provide a more comprehensive picture. Also, the article focuses primarily on the views of the OECD; including perspectives from other economic institutions or experts would add balance and provide a broader context.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the negative impact of tariffs on global economic growth, impacting job creation and overall economic prosperity. The slowdown in growth in the US, Eurozone, and other countries directly affects employment rates and economic opportunities. The mention of reduced workforce growth in the US due to immigration restrictions further underscores the negative impact on employment and economic growth.