themarker.com
Onavo Co-Founder Launches New Cybersecurity Startup with $20M Seed Funding
Roi Tiger, co-founder of the controversial data-collecting app Onavo, and three other Unit 8200 veterans secured over $20 million in seed funding for a new, currently unnamed cybersecurity startup focusing on endpoint security.
- What are the immediate implications of Roi Tiger's new cybersecurity startup securing $20 million in seed funding?
- Roi Tiger, a co-founder of Onavo, acquired by Meta (formerly Facebook), secured over $20 million in seed funding for a new cybersecurity startup. He is collaborating with three other co-founders, all veterans of Unit 8200, who bring extensive experience from companies like Medigate and Snowflake.
- How does the background of the founders, particularly their experience with Onavo and its controversies, influence the perception and potential trajectory of this new venture?
- This new venture, currently operating under secrecy, initially focuses on endpoint security, a market dominated by giants like Microsoft, CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne. The high seed funding reflects the founders' proven track record and experience in both startups and large corporations. However, the startup's focus might shift as it is still in its early stages.
- What are the long-term risks and opportunities for this new cybersecurity startup, considering the competitive landscape and its founders' past association with Onavo's data practices?
- The high-profile nature of this new startup, given its founders' background with Onavo, a company embroiled in controversy over data collection practices and subsequent lawsuits, presents a unique challenge. The founders' past success and the substantial funding suggest confidence in navigating this complex landscape, although future developments regarding the startup's direction and public perception are key.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly emphasizes the controversies surrounding Onavo and its alleged involvement in user surveillance. This framing, while informative, may overshadow the positive aspects of Tiger's career and the potential of his new venture. The headline (if one existed) would likely play a key role in this framing, potentially emphasizing the negative aspects more than the positive.
Language Bias
The article uses relatively neutral language in describing the new startup and its funding. However, the description of Onavo and its activities employs words like "alleged involvement in user surveillance" and "controversies," which carry negative connotations. While these are factual descriptions of reported events, the overall tone leans towards a negative portrayal of Onavo's history.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Onavo's controversial history and its connection to Facebook, potentially omitting other significant aspects of Roi Tiger's career and the new startup's potential. While the article mentions the new startup's initial focus on endpoint security, it also notes the possibility of a change in focus, suggesting a lack of concrete details about the company's current operations and goals. The article also doesn't delve into the specific technology or innovation behind the new startup, focusing instead on the founders' backgrounds and funding.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of Onavo's purpose, framing it primarily as either a legitimate market research tool or a tool for user surveillance and competitive intelligence gathering. The reality likely lies somewhere in between, with the company engaging in both data collection and providing user value. This framing ignores the nuances of data collection practices and their ethical implications.
Sustainable Development Goals
Onavo's data collection practices, while providing users with data-saving tools, raised concerns regarding user privacy and potential misuse of data. This relates to SDG 12, which promotes responsible consumption and production patterns, including sustainable management and efficient use of resources. The negative impact stems from the controversy surrounding Onavo's data collection methods and their potential violation of user privacy.