repubblica.it
One Million Species Face Extinction: Human Activities Drive Biodiversity Crisis
One million species face extinction, with 50% potentially disappearing by 2100 due to human activities like habitat loss, climate change, overexploitation, pollution, and invasive species; 84% of terrestrial endemics could vanish by 2100.
- What are the most significant impacts of the biodiversity crisis, and how urgently must we address them?
- One million species are at risk of extinction, with half potentially disappearing by 2100. This includes undiscovered species, and the crisis stems from human activities: habitat loss, climate change, overexploitation, pollution, and invasive species.
- What are the long-term implications of human-wildlife conflict, and how can policy address this challenge effectively?
- Overtourism threatens even remote areas like the Galapagos, exacerbating the issue in socially fragile regions where communities may prioritize immediate economic gains over long-term conservation. Sustainable tourism models, such as those employed in Bolivia's Madidi National Park, offer a potential solution by engaging local communities in conservation efforts.
- How does overexploitation, particularly in fishing, contribute to species extinction, and what alternative approaches exist?
- The climate crisis impacts biodiversity globally, altering species physiology (e.g., smaller birds with larger wings) and disrupting ecological relationships. Endemic terrestrial species are particularly vulnerable, with 84% facing extinction by 2100, exemplified by the endangered Alpine ibex whose high-altitude adaptations are challenged by warming temperatures.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity of biodiversity loss and the human impact. The use of alarming statistics (1 million species at risk, 50% potential extinction by 2100) and quotes highlighting the urgency of the situation creates a sense of crisis. While this is impactful, it could be balanced with a more prominent focus on successful conservation efforts and positive changes.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and informative. While terms like "debacle" and "crisis" convey seriousness, they are appropriate given the subject matter. There is no use of loaded language or emotionally charged terms to unduly influence the reader's opinion.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the threats to biodiversity and doesn't delve into potential solutions beyond sustainable tourism and education. While it mentions the role of policy and its shortcomings, it lacks a detailed exploration of alternative policy approaches or technological interventions that could mitigate biodiversity loss. The omission of these aspects might limit the reader's understanding of the full scope of responses to the crisis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant loss of biodiversity, with 1 million species at risk of extinction, 50% potentially disappearing by the end of the century. This directly impacts Life on Land, as the extinction of terrestrial and aquatic species severely diminishes the planet's biodiversity and ecosystem health. The text emphasizes human activities—habitat loss, climate change, overexploitation, pollution, and invasive species—as the primary drivers of this biodiversity crisis. The specific example of the endangered ibex, whose high-altitude habitat is shrinking due to global warming, further illustrates the direct threat to terrestrial ecosystems and species.