repubblica.it
Orphan: László Nemes's Venice Film Festival Entry Explores Generational Trauma
László Nemes's new film, Orphan, premiering at the Venice Film Festival, explores the complex father-son relationship in 1957 Budapest, revealing the lasting impact of the Holocaust and World War II on subsequent generations and highlighting the director's personal connection to the story.
- What are the core themes explored in László Nemes's Orphan, and what is their significance?
- Orphan delves into the intricate father-son relationship against the backdrop of post-war Budapest in 1957. It explores the lasting impact of the Holocaust and the 1956 Hungarian Revolution on personal lives and subsequent generations, highlighting the complexities of inherited trauma and its effects on identity formation.
- How does the film portray the impact of historical events on individual lives and family relationships?
- The film vividly depicts how the Holocaust and the 1956 revolution shaped the lives of its characters, particularly the father-son dynamic. The father's ambiguous past as an abuser and the son's struggle with a fragmented identity symbolize the generational transmission of trauma and the difficulty of reconciliation.
- What are the broader implications of the film's themes, and what does it suggest about the nature of trauma and reconciliation?
- Orphan suggests that unresolved historical trauma continues to shape present-day societies, influencing family relationships and individual identities. Nemes suggests a cyclical nature of trauma, with the potential for both repetition and the possibility of eventual reconciliation, even if challenging. The film also implicitly comments on the ongoing rise of antisemitism in Europe, highlighting the urgent need for healing and understanding.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article focuses heavily on the director's personal connection to the film, framing the movie as a deeply personal exploration of his family history. While this provides valuable context, it might overshadow the film's broader themes and artistic merit for some readers. The emphasis on the director's feelings and experiences could lead readers to focus more on the autobiographical aspects than the film's artistic qualities or universal themes.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive, although terms like "abusatore" (abuser) are used to describe the father figure, which might be considered loaded depending on the context and audience's interpretation. The description of the child as "quasi selvaggio" (almost savage) could also be interpreted as loaded language, though it reflects the harsh environment and might not necessarily be intended as a bias. There's a potential for negative connotation in phrases such as the director describing the father as 'tormentato e traumatizzato' (tormented and traumatized) and the father's love as existing 'nell'oscurità' (in darkness). These phrases do not offer neutrality; however, they are presented more as descriptions than judgments.
Bias by Omission
The article omits detailed critical analysis of the film itself. While the interview provides insight into the director's intentions, there's little mention of the cinematography, acting, or overall artistic merit, which could have provided a more balanced perspective. There is a lack of analysis on how the film's structure and techniques convey its messages, and also very little about the actual content of the film besides a few general comments. In addition, there is not much mentioned in relation to the film's reception, or its role in society, which would provide further context. The focus remains strongly on the director's personal narrative.
False Dichotomy
The director's statement about abusers and victims coexisting within the same person avoids a simplistic eitheor categorization, acknowledging human complexity. However, the discussion of the conflict between Jews and Arabs touches on a complex geopolitical issue but could be perceived as oversimplified in its presentation. The final comment on the internet and democracy being incompatible lacks substantial argumentation.
Gender Bias
The article focuses primarily on the male figures (the director and his father), and while it mentions the mothers and their choices, it does not provide a deep analysis of the female characters or the portrayal of gender roles in the film. More information on the role of women in the film is needed to assess potential gender bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The film indirectly addresses SDG 16 by depicting the lasting impact of war and political repression on individuals and families. The director's comments on the resurgence of antisemitism and the need for peace highlight the ongoing relevance of fostering peaceful and inclusive societies. The film's exploration of trauma and its intergenerational effects also connects to the need for strong institutions to address historical injustices and prevent future conflicts.