lemonde.fr
ORSE Guide Promotes Upskilling for Eco-Responsible Practices
The ORSE's new guide on CSR training, released February 6th, provides a framework for developing comprehensive training plans to upskill employees in eco-responsible practices, emphasizing collaboration between HR and CSR departments and promoting a just transition.
- What concrete steps does the ORSE guide propose for businesses to effectively upskill their workforce in eco-responsible practices?
- A new guide from the ORSE, published February 6th, offers a methodological framework for creating robust corporate social responsibility (CSR) training programs. This follows an initial phase of employee awareness-raising, suggesting a shift towards more advanced skill development in eco-responsible practices.
- How does the ORSE guide address the collaboration between HR and CSR departments in designing and implementing effective training programs?
- The guide aims to bridge the gap between CSR departments and HR, emphasizing the latter's crucial role in ecological transition. It advocates for collaborative training plans developed jointly by RH and RSE, highlighting the importance of both hard and soft skills for successful implementation.
- What are the potential long-term societal and economic impacts of prioritizing employee upskilling in the context of a just ecological transition, as suggested by the ORSE?
- The ORSE's approach promotes a 'just transition' by focusing on upskilling employees rather than job displacement. This necessitates developing not only technical skills but also behavioral competencies, including communication and leadership, to ensure widespread buy-in and effective change management.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue as a need for companies to proactively upskill their employees to avoid job losses, emphasizing the role of HR and CSR departments in ensuring a 'just transition'. This framing prioritizes the business perspective and the economic consequences of inaction, potentially overlooking other motivations for eco-responsible practices.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but terms like 'étape supérieure' (next step) imply a hierarchical progression that might overlook alternative learning approaches. The use of 'exhorter' (to urge) suggests a certain pressure on employers.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the ORSE's guide and doesn't delve into alternative approaches to upskilling employees for green jobs. It omits discussion of government initiatives, educational programs outside of corporate training, or individual learning resources.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by suggesting that the 'sensibilisation' phase (awareness-raising) using tools like 'La Fresque du Climat' is concluding and that the next step is solely corporate training. It ignores other parallel pathways for employee upskilling.
Sustainable Development Goals
The guide promotes upskilling employees for eco-responsible jobs, fostering a just transition and ensuring employment in a green economy. This directly contributes to decent work and economic growth by preparing the workforce for the evolving job market and reducing unemployment related to the ecological transition.