dw.com
Ortega Appoints Sanctioned General Avilés to Lead Nicaraguan Army for Sixth Term
Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega swore in sanctioned General Julio César Avilés as head of the army on February 21, 2025, for a six-year term, amid accusations of using military funds to secure loyalty and a constitutional reform consolidating power within the Ortega-Murillo family.
- How does the constitutional reform in Nicaragua, which extended the presidential term and created the 'co-president' role for Rosario Murillo, affect the country's political and social stability?
- Ortega's decision to extend General Avilés's term is part of a broader constitutional reform that centralizes power within the Ortega-Murillo family. This reform, passed by the government-controlled Congress, also created the position of 'co-president' for Rosario Murillo and granted them absolute control over all state organs. The reforms expand presidential terms from five to six years and include provisions for increased surveillance of the press and the Church.
- What are the immediate implications of General Avilés's reappointment as head of the Nicaraguan Army, considering the US sanctions against him and the context of Nicaragua's political landscape?
- On February 21, 2025, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega appointed General Julio César Avilés, who is under US sanctions, as the head of the Nicaraguan Army for a fourth six-year term. This appointment follows Avilés's previous 15 years in the post and comes amid accusations of Ortega enriching the military to secure their loyalty. The move extends the military's leadership beyond the traditional five-year term.
- What are the long-term implications of the Nicaraguan government's actions, including the increased military influence and the suppression of dissent, for the country's future and its relations with the international community?
- The consolidation of power within the Ortega-Murillo family, coupled with the military's continued loyalty, suggests a potential succession plan. The deceased brother of the president, Humberto Ortega, previously indicated the military's role in any transition following Daniel Ortega's death. The creation of a 'volunteer police force' composed of hooded civilians further strengthens the regime's ability to suppress dissent, echoing the tactics used during the 2018 protests.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introductory paragraphs frame Ortega's actions in a highly critical light. The use of terms like "sanctioned by the United States", "dictatorship", and "repressing protestors" sets a negative tone from the outset, shaping the reader's perception before they encounter any potentially mitigating information. The emphasis on accusations of corruption and human rights abuses reinforces this negative framing throughout the article. While the article does present facts, the selected facts and order creates a narrative that strongly suggests Ortega's rule is oppressive.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "dictatorship", "repression", and "corrupt", which carry negative connotations and contribute to a biased portrayal of Ortega's regime. For example, instead of "powerful wife," a more neutral description might be "wife who holds a significant political role." The description of the "Policía Voluntaria" as referencing "paramilitaries" is another instance of biased language; a more neutral description might be "civilian auxiliary force". The repeated use of such language subtly influences the reader's understanding towards a negative portrayal.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on criticism of Ortega's regime, mentioning accusations of dictatorship and human rights abuses. However, it omits perspectives that might offer a more balanced view of the situation. For instance, it doesn't include any statements from the Nicaraguan government defending its actions or providing alternative explanations for the events described. The article also fails to mention any potential positive outcomes or developments in Nicaragua under Ortega's leadership. This omission might leave readers with an incomplete and potentially skewed understanding of the political landscape in the country.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat dichotomous view of the situation, portraying Ortega as a dictator and his opponents as victims. It does not fully explore the complexities of the political situation, such as the motivations and goals of those who support Ortega, or the potential nuances within the opposition. The focus remains largely on the negative aspects, ignoring any possible internal dissent or diversity of opinion within supporting groups. This creates a simplified and potentially inaccurate portrayal of the situation.
Gender Bias
While the article mentions both Ortega and Murillo, the focus remains primarily on Ortega's actions and decisions. Murillo's role is described primarily in relation to Ortega, reinforcing a patriarchal power dynamic. While her power and influence are noted, her independent actions or statements are not emphasized, potentially underrepresenting her role as a significant political actor. The article does not explicitly focus on gendered stereotypes or language, but the overall power dynamics described present a subtle gender bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the extension of the military chief's term by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, alongside constitutional reforms that consolidate the government's power and control over state institutions. This undermines democratic principles, strengthens authoritarian rule, and raises concerns about human rights violations. The creation of a "voluntary police" force, reminiscent of the paramilitary groups responsible for violence in 2018, further exacerbates these concerns. These actions hinder the establishment of peaceful and inclusive societies and obstruct justice.