news.sky.com
Oscars 2025: Ceremony Details and Predictions
The 97th Academy Awards will be held today at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles, starting at 7 PM ET (midnight UK time), hosted by Conan O'Brien; the ceremony will feature performances by Ariana Grande, Cynthia Erivo and others and highlight a theme of 'celebration of connection' following recent LA wildfires.
- What are the potential upsets or surprises that could occur during this year's Oscars ceremony?
- The 2025 Oscars are anticipated to be highly competitive, with several potential upsets. Fernanda Torres's late surge in popularity for her role in "I'm Still Here" could lead to a surprise win in Best Actress or even Best Picture, mirroring the success of "Parasite". Timothee Chalamet also has an outside shot at winning Best Actor.
- What are the key details of the 97th Academy Awards ceremony, including time, location, and theme?
- The 97th Academy Awards ceremony will be held today at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles, starting with the red carpet at 3:30 PM ET (8:30 PM UK time) and the ceremony at 7 PM ET (midnight UK time). This year's theme, "celebration of connection," aims to unite the film community after recent wildfires in Los Angeles. Comedian Conan O'Brien will host.
- Why were the usual best original song nominee performances replaced this year, and what are the planned performances?
- The Oscars, following a period of uncertainty due to the wildfires, proceed as a symbol of resilience. The ceremony features musical performances by Ariana Grande, Cynthia Erivo, Doja Cat, Blackpink, and others, replacing the usual best original song nominees' performances. The awards show will present 23 categories (24 next year), with winners given 45 seconds for acceptance speeches.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the entertainment aspects of the Oscars, highlighting celebrity appearances, performances, and predictions. The headline and introduction immediately set this tone, focusing on the glamorous setting and the anticipation of the event rather than the artistic achievements being honored. The use of phrases like "starriest night" and "A-list celebrities" prioritizes the celebrity culture aspect over the artistic merit of the films and performances. This framing might lead readers to view the Oscars primarily as a social event rather than a celebration of cinematic excellence.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and descriptive. However, certain phrases such as "A-list celebrities," "hotly contested competition," and "starriest night" carry positive connotations and contribute to the overall celebratory tone, potentially overshadowing any critical analysis. The use of terms like "swoop in and take the prize" when referring to potential winners adds a degree of sensationalism. More neutral alternatives could include "prominent actors," "competitive race," and "the awards ceremony." The use of phrases like "self-destructing campaign" to describe a film's marketing could also be considered loaded language.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the spectacle of the awards ceremony, including details about performers, presenters, and potential winners. However, it omits discussion of the films themselves beyond mentioning a few nominees and potential winners. This omission could leave readers with a superficial understanding of the awards, lacking deeper critical analysis of the films' artistic merits or societal impact. The focus on celebrity and entertainment overshadows any substantial discussion of the cinematic achievements being celebrated. While space constraints may partially explain this omission, it still significantly impacts the article's overall value.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the awards race, suggesting clear frontrunners in certain categories while acknowledging the possibility of upsets. However, it doesn't fully explore the nuances of the various critical and popular opinions surrounding the nominations. The framing of potential winners as either 'favorites' or 'underdogs' oversimplifies the complex judging process and the diversity of perspectives within the film industry.
Gender Bias
The article features a balanced representation of male and female celebrities, with both genders receiving equal attention in terms of mentions and descriptions. However, there is a potential subtle bias in the description of potential winners. While the article mentions both male and female contenders, the focus on physical appearance or other non-artistic attributes is not consistently applied to both genders. This lack of consistency could suggest a bias towards focusing on female appearance, although it is not overtly prominent. More equitable coverage might entail a more consistent approach in describing both male and female nominees.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Oscars, by celebrating diverse talent from around the world, including Fernanda Torres's potential win for "I'm Still Here," promotes inclusivity and challenges existing power structures within the film industry. This aligns with SDG 10, which aims to reduce inequalities within and among countries.