dw.com
Overtourism: A Global Tourism Boom Strains Resources and Damages the Environment
Global tourism reached a near-record high in 2022, yet overtourism, defined by the UNWTO as a decline in quality of life due to excessive tourism, is straining resources and causing environmental damage in places like the Canary Islands, Mallorca, and other hotspots, prompting initiatives to control visitor numbers and promote sustainable practices.
- How does the increasing popularity of short-haul flights and cruise ships contribute to the problem of overtourism and its environmental impact?
- The economic benefits of tourism are primarily enjoyed by large investors, while locals face issues like rising rents and environmental damage. Overtourism contributes to noise pollution, littering, and habitat destruction. Increased water consumption by tourists, especially in water-scarce regions, and untreated sewage harming marine ecosystems, such as the Posidonia seagrass meadows off Mallorca, are significant concerns.
- What are the primary environmental and socioeconomic consequences of the global surge in tourism, and how do these impacts vary across different destinations?
- Global tourism reached its second-highest level in 2022 with approximately 1.5 billion arrivals, yet this boom has led to overtourism in many popular destinations. Overtourism, as defined by the UNWTO, occurs when the quality of life for locals or the visitor experience deteriorates due to excessive tourism. This impacts areas like the Canary Islands, where 15.2 million tourists visited in 2022, exceeding the resident population of 2.2 million and straining resources.
- What innovative solutions are being implemented or proposed to address overtourism sustainably, while balancing economic benefits with environmental protection and community well-being?
- The rise in short-haul flights, now accounting for a quarter of tourist trips but three-quarters of emissions, exacerbates the climate impact. Initiatives to mitigate overtourism include restricting access to certain sites, charging entry fees, and implementing digital booking systems to manage visitor flow. Sustainable tourism models like Copenhagen's incentivizing train travel with bike rentals and guided tours demonstrate a promising approach.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed negatively, focusing primarily on the problems associated with overtourism. While it mentions the economic importance of tourism, this is presented primarily as a point of contention, rather than a benefit. The headline (if one were to be created) would likely emphasize the negative aspects, shaping reader perception.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language, such as "exploding rents," "suffers," and "crisis." These words contribute to a negative perception of overtourism. More neutral alternatives could include "rising rents," "experiences challenges," and "significant environmental concerns." The repeated emphasis on negative consequences also creates a biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative impacts of overtourism, mentioning economic benefits mainly to criticize the disproportionate distribution of these benefits. While acknowledging that tourism is a significant part of the economy for some areas (e.g., Canary Islands), it omits discussion of potential positive economic impacts for local communities or strategies to mitigate negative impacts and promote sustainable tourism. The article also doesn't explore alternative perspectives on the issue, such as the viewpoints of tourism businesses or those who may benefit from it.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between the negative impacts of overtourism and the economic benefits, implying that these are mutually exclusive. It fails to explore the possibility of balancing economic growth with environmental protection and social well-being. The article does not sufficiently address the possibility of sustainable tourism.
Sustainable Development Goals
Overtourism leads to environmental degradation, strain on resources, and diminished quality of life for residents in popular tourist destinations. The article cites examples of increased pollution, habitat destruction, and inflated housing costs due to short-term rentals.