lexpress.fr
Pakistan Floods: 800 Dead, Corruption and Poor Urban Planning Blamed
Pakistan's recent monsoon season has caused nearly 800 deaths and 1000 injuries due to flooding, exacerbated by illegal construction near waterways and corruption in permitting processes, highlighting systemic issues in urban planning and infrastructure.
- What is the immediate human cost and the primary contributing factor behind the devastating floods in Pakistan?
- Recent catastrophic floods in Pakistan, exacerbated by human factors, have resulted in nearly 800 deaths and 1000 injuries. The Prime Minister acknowledged the role of corruption and political influence in permitting construction near waterways, contributing to the devastation. Many homes, including that of Fazal Khan, were rebuilt in flood-prone areas despite previous disasters.
- How do political corruption and urban planning practices contribute to the severity of flood damage in Pakistan?
- The floods highlight a systemic failure in Pakistan's urban planning and infrastructure. Illegal construction, exacerbated by corruption and a lack of enforcement, obstructs natural drainage systems. Deforestation, down to 5% of land cover, further worsens the impact of heavy rainfall.
- What are the long-term implications of Pakistan's current approach to infrastructure development and disaster management, considering the rising costs and the impact of climate change?
- Pakistan's vulnerability to extreme weather events will likely increase due to climate change. The high cost of remediation projects (e.g., $180 million for reopening three drainage canals in Karachi) underscores the need for proactive, long-term urban planning reforms that prioritize sustainable development and stricter building regulations. The current political system, with its clientelism and corruption, needs substantial reform to address these issues effectively.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue primarily through the lens of governmental failures and corruption. While this is a significant aspect, the focus on political infighting and bureaucratic inefficiencies might overshadow the suffering of the victims and the broader humanitarian crisis. The repeated emphasis on corruption and political maneuvering could shape the reader's perception towards a more cynical view of the situation.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, employing factual reporting and direct quotes. However, terms like "inondations monstres" (monster floods) and descriptions of "pluies diluviennes" (deluge rains) inject a degree of sensationalism. While evocative, these phrases could be replaced with more neutral terms like "severe floods" and "heavy rainfall" to maintain objective reporting.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the immediate consequences of the floods and the government's response, but it omits a discussion of long-term preventative measures that could be implemented to mitigate future disasters. While it mentions climate change as a contributing factor, it lacks detail on specific policies or international collaborations aimed at addressing this issue. Furthermore, the article doesn't explore potential alternative building materials or construction techniques that might be more resilient to flooding. The limited scope might be due to space constraints, but this omission weakens the article's overall analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the 'will of God' and human factors contributing to the disaster. While acknowledging the natural element, it heavily emphasizes human negligence and corruption, potentially neglecting the complex interplay between natural events and human actions. This framing may oversimplify the issue and overshadow the role of climate change.
Gender Bias
The article features several male voices, including government officials and affected individuals. While Sherry Rehman, a female former minister, is quoted, her contribution is largely focused on technical aspects of environmental damage. There is no explicit gender bias, but a more balanced inclusion of female perspectives on the lived experiences of the disaster could enrich the narrative.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the devastating impact of monsoon rains and flooding in Pakistan, exacerbated by inadequate urban planning, corruption in construction permits, and a lack of infrastructure. This directly relates to SDG 11, which aims to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. The consequences described, including loss of life, damaged homes, and overwhelmed infrastructure, demonstrate a failure to achieve this goal. The quote, "Karachi n'est pas devastée par la pluie, mais par des années de négligence," encapsulates this failure, attributing the crisis to long-term negligence rather than solely to natural events.