gr.euronews.com
People's March" 2024: Smaller Scale, Broader Focus
The "People's March", a significantly smaller successor to the 2017 "Women's March", will take place in Washington D.C. on Saturday, focusing on issues such as women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, climate, and democracy; organizers aim for sustained activism, not just a single event.
- How has the People's March adapted its goals and strategies since its 2017 iteration, and what challenges does it face?
- The 2024 People's March, taking place shortly before Donald Trump's inauguration, aims to address a wider range of issues including women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, climate, and democracy, unlike the 2017 march which largely focused on Trump's election. The organizers explicitly state that this march is not intended to be the final action, aiming instead to foster long-term engagement.
- What is the significance of the "People's March" in 2024, considering its smaller scale compared to the 2017 "Women's March"?
- Eight years after its inception, the "Women's March" returns to Washington D.C., now renamed the "People's March", with significantly fewer attendees than its 2017 peak of over 500,000 participants. This year's march, anticipated to be about one-tenth the size, reflects the challenges faced by broad-based social movements.
- What are the long-term implications of the People's March's broadened focus and smaller scale for the future of social justice movements in the US?
- The shift from a singular focus on Trump's election in 2017 to a broader agenda in 2024 reflects the evolution of the movement, which faced internal divisions and criticism regarding inclusivity. The smaller scale of the 2024 march suggests a transition from large-scale mobilization to sustained, focused activism on various social justice issues. The broader focus is an attempt to attract a larger and more diverse group.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the decline in participation since the 2017 march, highlighting the challenges faced by the movement. This could be interpreted as downplaying the ongoing relevance and impact of the movement, even with fewer participants. The title change from "Women's March" to "People's March" is presented as a reaction to past criticisms, potentially framing this as a necessary adaptation rather than a shift in core values or goals.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective, although phrases like "intense disappointment" and "poisoned American society" might carry slightly loaded connotations, depending on the reader's interpretation. These could be replaced with more neutral alternatives such as "significant disappointment" and "negatively impacted American society.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the 2017 Women's March and its decline in participation, potentially omitting other significant social justice movements or protests that occurred during the same period. This omission might create a skewed perception of the overall state of social activism.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it implicitly suggests a tension between a singular, massive protest and a broader, more sustained movement. This might inadvertently create an eitheor framing of effective activism.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the Women's March, a movement advocating for women's rights, reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and other social justice issues. The march directly addresses gender equality by bringing attention to and mobilizing action around issues that disproportionately affect women and marginalized groups. The mention of reproductive rights is particularly relevant to SDG 5.1, which aims to eliminate discrimination against women and girls.