dw.com
Photo of Drowned Syrian Boy Alan Kurdi Marked 10 Years of Impact and Change in Refugee Discourse
Ten years ago, the photo of 2-year-old Syrian refugee Alan Kurdi, drowned on a Turkish beach, sparked a global outcry, but the situation for refugees remains dire, with approximately one child dying daily in the central Mediterranean.
- How did the Alan Kurdi photo influence humanitarian organizations, and what was their response?
- The photo prompted Sea-Eye, a rescue organization, to name a rescue ship after Alan Kurdi, which saved over 900 people. However, the organization later chose not to name a subsequent vessel after Alan's brother due to hateful online comments targeting the family.
- What was the immediate impact of the Alan Kurdi photo on public awareness and political action?
- Within 12 hours, almost 20 million people viewed the photo. It caused a shift in public discourse on refugees, leading to protests, increased aid, and the issuance of entry permits for thousands of refugees stranded in Hungary. This prompted a proposal for an EU-Turkey agreement to manage migration and prevent further deaths.
- What long-term consequences and shifts in public opinion have occurred since the Alan Kurdi photo became public?
- Despite initial widespread sympathy, the refugee situation hasn't improved. A harsher anti-refugee sentiment has emerged, and border controls have become stricter. Approximately 3,500 children have died in the central Mediterranean in the last 10 years, averaging one child per day.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article uses the image of Alan Kurdi's body as a central framing device. While the image is undeniably impactful and relevant to the discussion of refugee migration, the article's focus on the photograph's impact risks overshadowing other important aspects of the refugee crisis. The headline, while not explicitly provided, would likely emphasize the photo's influence, potentially reinforcing this framing bias. The repeated mention of the photo's virality and its effect on public opinion could lead readers to focus more on the immediate emotional response to the image than on broader policy considerations or systematic issues contributing to the refugee crisis.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, focusing on factual reporting of events and expert opinions. However, phrases like "moral depravity" in describing comments on the photo could be considered loaded, implying a strong moral judgment. The article also uses strong emotional language in describing the image itself ("unspeakable cry," "deeply moved"), which while understandable given the subject matter, could inadvertently sway the reader's emotional response.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the impact of Alan Kurdi's image and the subsequent changes in public opinion and policy. It omits detailed discussion of specific policies enacted or their effectiveness in addressing the root causes of the refugee crisis. While acknowledging the ongoing deaths of children, the article doesn't delve into the broader political and economic factors driving migration or explore alternative solutions in depth. The limited space in a news article likely contributes to these omissions, but it still results in an incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article implicitly presents a dichotomy between the emotional impact of the photo and the lack of lasting policy change. This framing simplifies a complex issue by suggesting a direct causal link between the photo's impact and the current situation. It overlooks other factors that may have contributed to the lack of progress in addressing the refugee crisis, such as political opposition, bureaucratic obstacles, or lack of international cooperation.
Gender Bias
The article primarily focuses on the actions and statements of male figures (researchers, activists). While Nilüfer Demir is mentioned as the photographer, her role is primarily presented in relation to the image's impact rather than as an independent actor in the events. The article does not explicitly discuss gendered aspects of the refugee crisis or gender imbalances in the affected populations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the plight of refugees, including children, who are forced to undertake perilous journeys due to poverty and lack of opportunities in their home countries. Their deaths at sea underscore the devastating consequences of poverty and displacement, hindering progress towards SDG 1 (No Poverty).