dw.com
Polarization and Far-Right Populism Hinder Global Cooperation"
Experts warn of rising polarization in the US and Germany, linking the success of far-right parties like the AfD to increased prejudice against minorities and hindering effective responses to global challenges such as climate change and migration.
- How does the rise of far-right populism in countries like the US and Germany hinder international cooperation on global challenges, and what are the immediate consequences?
- Rising polarization threatens global cooperation on critical issues like climate change and migration, as seen in the US and Germany. The AfD's success in Germany correlates with increased prejudice against minorities even among non-AfD voters, hindering political compromise.
- What is the correlation between the success of far-right parties and increased prejudice against minorities, and how do these prejudiced attitudes affect political compromise and social cohesion?
- The study by the FGZ reveals a link between the regional success of far-right parties and increased negative attitudes towards minorities. This polarization, fueled by the instrumentalization of immigration issues by far-right leaders like Trump and Weidel, undermines social cohesion and effective problem-solving.
- Beyond migration, what are the deeper socioeconomic factors contributing to social division, and how can addressing these factors help counter the influence of far-right narratives and foster genuine social cohesion?
- Focusing solely on migration as the source of social division ignores deeper socioeconomic issues like affordable housing and fair wages. Addressing these underlying problems is crucial to fostering social cohesion and countering the narrative of far-right parties, which exploit existing inequalities.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the rise of far-right parties like the AfD as a major driver of social division. While this is a valid perspective, the framing could be broadened to include other factors contributing to polarization. The headline (if any) and introduction likely emphasize this aspect.
Language Bias
The article generally maintains a neutral tone, using precise language to describe events and perspectives. However, certain loaded terms such as "ultra-direita" (far-right) and descriptions of political figures' statements, while factually accurate, might subtly influence the reader's perception. Replacing these terms with more neutral synonyms could enhance objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the political polarization in Germany and the US, mentioning other global challenges briefly. A more comprehensive analysis of global polarization, including specific examples from various regions and perspectives, would strengthen the piece. The article also omits discussion of potential solutions proposed by groups outside the far-right.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the far-right's focus on immigration as the sole cause of social division and the need to address broader social issues. While immigration is a significant factor, the article acknowledges that the issue is more complex and involves economic inequality and lack of social mobility.
Gender Bias
The article mentions both male and female political figures and uses gender-neutral language for the most part. However, more attention could be paid to the impact of gender on the experience of social division, particularly focusing on the different ways women and men may be affected by the rise of the far right.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights growing social divisions and polarization, leading to increased prejudice against minorities and hindering efforts to reduce inequality. The rise of far-right parties and their focus on migration as the sole cause of division exacerbates existing inequalities and marginalizes vulnerable groups. The lack of focus on addressing fundamental social issues like affordable housing and fair wages further contributes to the widening gap between different social groups.