npr.org
Police Deception in Interrogations
The legal and ethical debate surrounding the use of deception by police during interrogations, and its impact on wrongful convictions.
English
United States
Human Rights ViolationsUs PoliticsJustice SystemLaw EnforcementEthicsConfessionInterrogation
Innocence ProjectWashington Innocence ProjectWashington Association Of Sheriffs And Police Chiefs
Ted BradfordLaura NiriderLara ZarowskyStrom PetersonJames McmahanJim TrainumMark Fallon
- What are some alternative interrogation methods that do not rely on deception?
- Alternatives to deceptive interrogation include methods that build rapport and focus on gathering information rather than securing confessions, as used in some European countries. This approach prioritizes building trust and obtaining accurate information.
- What are the arguments for and against banning deceptive interrogation practices?
- Law enforcement agencies often oppose bans on deceptive interrogation techniques, arguing that these tactics lead to more true confessions than false ones and are crucial for solving crimes. They also claim that judges already assess the voluntariness of confessions.
- What happened to Ted Bradford during his interrogation that led to his wrongful conviction?
- Ted Bradford was wrongfully convicted of rape after confessing during an interrogation where police used deception. His confession, based on false claims of evidence, was later recanted and he was exonerated years later through DNA testing.
- What evidence supports the claim that deceptive interrogation techniques lead to wrongful convictions?
- The Innocence Project reports that nearly one-third of DNA exonerations involved false confessions, highlighting the risks of deceptive interrogation tactics. These tactics are especially harmful to vulnerable groups like young adults and those with intellectual disabilities.
- What is the current legal status of police deception in interrogations in the US, and what changes are being proposed?
- Many states allow police to lie to adult suspects during interrogations to obtain confessions, while a growing number are banning this practice for juveniles. Advocates argue that this deception leads to false confessions and wrongful convictions.