kathimerini.gr
POSDEP Demands Changes to Greek University Student Deletion Policy
Facing September 1st, 2025, student deletion deadlines, Greece's Panhellenic Federation of University Students (POSDEP) urges the government to allow universities to decide on extension terms for active students, establish student performance monitoring systems, and improve university admission and infrastructure.
- How does POSDEP propose addressing the systemic issues contributing to student failure and dropout rates in Greek universities?
- POSDEP's requests stem from upcoming student deletions starting September 1st, 2025, affecting those exceeding the grace periods provided by Law 4957/2022. The federation advocates for university autonomy in deciding on extensions beyond the maximum study duration, prioritizing active students.
- What are the core demands of POSDEP regarding the upcoming deletion of inactive university students starting September 1st, 2025?
- The Panhellenic Federation of University Students (POSDEP) proposes deleting inactive students but requests favorable arrangements for those nearing graduation or within their minimum study time. They seek extensions for specific student categories and an increase in the maximum study duration from n+2 to 2n, where 'n' represents the minimum study years.
- What long-term systemic changes does POSDEP advocate for to improve the efficiency and success rate of university education in Greece?
- POSDEP suggests establishing 'study observatories' in each department to monitor student performance and identify failure causes. They also propose improving university infrastructure, student-teacher ratios, and streamlining university admission to better match student preferences and abilities. This proactive approach aims to address student failure and dropout rates.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is framed to highlight the POSDEP's concerns and proposals, making them appear reasonable and necessary. The urgency of the situation is emphasized by mentioning impending deletions starting September 1st. This framing might influence readers to favor the POSDEP's perspective.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, reporting the POSDEP's requests and proposals without overtly biased language. However, phrases like "ευνοϊκές ρυθμίσεις" (favorable adjustments) could be seen as slightly subjective, although within the context, it is acceptable. More neutral alternatives could include "flexible arrangements" or "modified regulations".
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses heavily on the POSDEP's proposals and actions, potentially omitting counterarguments or perspectives from the Ministry of Education or other stakeholders. The analysis lacks information on the reasoning behind the current regulations and the potential consequences of the POSDEP's suggestions. It also doesn't mention the broader societal impact of the proposed changes.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a somewhat simplified view by focusing on the need to address inactive students without fully exploring alternative solutions that might balance the need for efficient resource allocation with student support. The implied dichotomy is between eliminating inactive students and providing unlimited extensions. More nuanced approaches aren't fully considered.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses measures to improve the quality of education by addressing issues of student retention and success in higher education. The proposals aim to create more supportive learning environments and improve student support systems, ultimately leading to better educational outcomes. The suggestions for academic advising and student monitoring systems directly contribute to SDG 4, which focuses on ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all.