taz.de
Pre-Crime Behavioral Indicators: Improving Threat Assessment and Prevention
Psychologist Rebecca Bondü discusses "leaking", pre-crime behavioral indicators, using the Bielefeld and Magdeburg cases to illustrate how recognizing such signals—like expressed violent intentions—can improve threat assessment and prevention, despite challenges in data sharing and public awareness.
- What specific behavioral indicators precede violent acts, and how can their detection improve crime prevention?
- Leaking" refers to pre-crime behavioral indicators like expressed violent intentions or planning, detectable before a crime's execution. While not all individuals exhibiting leaking engage in violence, its presence suggests a heightened risk requiring intervention. The Bielefeld suspect's statements, like those of the Magdeburg perpetrator, exemplify such alarming pre-crime behavior.
- How do the cases of Bielefeld and Magdeburg illustrate the limitations of traditional risk factor analysis compared to focusing on pre-crime behavioral indicators?
- The article highlights the limitations of relying solely on risk factors (e.g., suicide ideation, bullying) for identifying potential perpetrators, as these factors are not exclusive to future offenders. Instead, focusing on "leaking"—observable behaviors indicative of imminent violence—offers a more precise approach to threat assessment. This is demonstrated by the cases of Bielefeld and Magdeburg, where pre-crime behaviors were evident.
- What systemic changes—in data sharing, public awareness, and police training—are necessary to effectively utilize the concept of "leaking" in preventing violent crime?
- Improving threat assessment requires widespread awareness of "leaking" among professionals (social workers, law enforcement) and the public. Enhanced data sharing, anonymous reporting mechanisms, and specialized police training can improve detection and intervention. Additionally, addressing the public's hesitation to report due to fear or uncertainty is crucial for effective prevention.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the psychologist's expertise and the potential for improved violence prevention through better understanding of 'leaking' behaviors. While this is valuable, it might unintentionally downplay systemic issues within law enforcement or broader societal factors.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the psychologist's perspective and doesn't include direct quotes or statements from law enforcement officials involved in the cases mentioned. This omission limits the ability to assess the police's actions and decision-making processes.
Gender Bias
The article features a female psychologist as the main source, which is positive for gender balance. However, the discussion of partner killings focuses on male perpetrators and female victims, which, while reflecting the reality of this type of violence, doesn't offer diverse perspectives.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the importance of identifying and addressing "leaking" behaviors—warning signs that precede violent acts. Improving the ability of authorities to recognize and respond to these signals can prevent future crimes, thus contributing to safer and more just communities. The development of tools like Lateran-IT for risk assessment directly supports this goal. The discussion of challenges in information sharing highlights the need for better institutional cooperation and data protection policies to enhance effectiveness.