elpais.com
Problematic Social Media Use Linked to Increased Belief and Sharing of Misinformation
A study of 189 individuals aged 18-26 found a correlation between problematic social media use, characterized by dependence and mood swings related to its use, and a higher tendency to believe and share fake news; researchers suggest social media platforms could help mitigate this.
- What is the relationship between problematic social media use and the spread of misinformation?
- A new study reveals a correlation between problematic social media use and a higher tendency to believe and share misinformation. Individuals exhibiting problematic usage, characterized by excessive dependence and mood swings related to social media, are more likely to click on fake news. This problematic use includes constant worry, mood swings, seeking validation through likes, real-life conflicts, and withdrawal symptoms.
- What methods were used in the study to establish the link between social media usage and engagement with fake news?
- The study, involving 189 participants aged 18-26, presented 20 news items (10 real, 10 fake) as social media posts. Results showed a link between problematic social media use and increased likelihood of believing fake news to be true, interacting with both real and fake news, and a greater desire to click on fake news specifically. The researchers suggest impulsivity as a possible underlying factor.
- How can social media platforms collaborate with researchers to address the issue of misinformation among users exhibiting problematic social media usage?
- This research suggests social media platforms could play a crucial role in mitigating the spread of misinformation by identifying users with problematic usage patterns and adapting their algorithms. For instance, users undergoing treatment for excessive social media use could be offered alternative algorithms to reduce exposure to fake news. Further research is needed to explore the causal relationship between problematic social media use and misinformation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers on the negative consequences of problematic social media use, highlighting its link to increased susceptibility to fake news. The headline (which is not included in the provided text) would likely reinforce this focus. While this is a valid research area, other angles, such as the role of algorithms in promoting fake news or the responsibility of social media platforms, are less emphasized. This framing could unintentionally influence readers to primarily view social media as the culprit.
Language Bias
The language used is mostly neutral and objective. The author uses terms like "problematic social media use" and "fake news" which are relatively neutral, avoiding highly charged or emotionally loaded language. The quote from the researcher is presented without editorial spin.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the correlation between problematic social media use and the spread of misinformation, but it omits discussion on other factors that contribute to believing and sharing fake news, such as media literacy, cognitive biases, and the role of social networks in amplifying information regardless of its veracity. While the study acknowledges the limitation of not exploring impulsivity, other potential contributing factors are not mentioned. This omission limits the scope of understanding the problem.
Sustainable Development Goals
The study highlights how problematic social media use correlates with a higher tendency to believe and share misinformation. This impacts the ability to critically assess information, a crucial skill for quality education. The inability to discern credible sources undermines the educational process and contributes to the spread of false narratives, hindering the acquisition of accurate knowledge.