elmundo.es
PSOE influence leads to Correos director dismissal, €300 million in losses
In early 2022, Correos' Innovation director Jordi Escruela was dismissed to allow Leire Díez, connected to high-ranking PSOE members, to become Philately director; this resulted in over €300 million in losses for Correos during the period of her employment, raising concerns about political influence and cronyism.
- How did Leire Díez's prior employment history and political connections influence her career advancement at Correos?
- Leire Díez's career progression involved moving from Enusa to Correos, facilitated by her connections to Juan Manuel Serrano, then-president of Correos and former chief of staff to Pedro Sánchez. The PSOE's influence is evident in these appointments, highlighting potential concerns about favoritism and cronyism within the organization. Correos experienced losses exceeding €300 million during Serrano's presidency.
- What were the circumstances surrounding the removal of Correos' Innovation director and the subsequent appointment of Leire Díez?
- In early 2022, Correos' Innovation director, Jordi Escruela, was forced out after more than 10 years to make way for Leire Díez as Philately director. This decision was supported by high-ranking PSOE members, José Luis Ábalos and Santos Cerdán. Escruela's dismissal followed his refusal to step down to a lower position.
- What are the long-term implications of political influence on the management and financial performance of state-owned enterprises like Correos?
- The incident reveals a pattern of political influence impacting state-owned companies. Díez's rapid advancement, despite limited experience in the field, raises questions about meritocracy and accountability within Correos. The substantial financial losses incurred during this period underscore the potential negative consequences of such practices on public enterprises.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's headline and introductory paragraphs strongly suggest wrongdoing by the PSOE. The sequencing of events emphasizes the actions of the PSOE and Leire Díez, leading the reader to conclude that their actions caused the dismissal of Jordi Escruela. The inclusion of details about Leire Díez's previous positions and connections with PSOE figures further reinforces this narrative. The extensive detail given to Leire Díez's career progression versus limited details on the expertise of Jordi Escruela creates a bias in the reader's perception.
Language Bias
The article uses language that implies negative judgment towards the PSOE's actions, such as phrases like "forzó la marcha" (forced the departure) and descriptions of the events as "meteórica" (meteoric) and implying impropriety. While using neutral language to describe events, the author uses selection of details, sequencing, and emphasis to convey a biased opinion. More neutral wording could include replacing "forced the departure" with "facilitated the departure of" or similar neutral phrasing. Describing the career advancement as "rapid" instead of "meteoric" would also reduce the negative connotation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions and motivations of the PSOE party and Leire Díez, potentially omitting other contributing factors to the situation at Correos. It also doesn't detail the selection process for Leire Díez's initial hiring, beyond mentioning a "selection process." The financial losses of Correos are mentioned, but a deeper analysis of the causes beyond the implication of leadership changes is absent. The article also doesn't explore potential counterarguments or perspectives from those who may disagree with the portrayal of events. Finally, there's no mention of the overall performance or success of Leire Díez's tenure as director of Philately, beyond a single event mentioned.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat simplistic "eitheor" framing: either Escruela was unfairly dismissed to make way for Díez, or the PSOE's actions were justified. The article doesn't fully explore the complexities of Correos's financial situation or the potential merits of the changes made. There's an implication that the financial losses are directly attributable to the leadership changes, but this is not explicitly stated or supported with detailed evidence.
Gender Bias
While the article doesn't explicitly use gendered language to demean either Díez or Escruela, the focus on Díez's career trajectory and personal life (mentioning her book project and work hours) might be disproportionate compared to the information given about Escruela. This difference could inadvertently contribute to a gender bias in how their respective actions are perceived.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a case where a political connection appears to have influenced hiring and promotion decisions at Correos, potentially undermining merit-based systems and increasing inequality. The forced resignation of a long-serving innovation director to make way for a politically connected individual suggests a breach of fair employment practices and equal opportunities. The significant salary difference between the positions further emphasizes this inequality.