Public Trust in AI: A Critical Metric for Business Success

Public Trust in AI: A Critical Metric for Business Success

forbes.com

Public Trust in AI: A Critical Metric for Business Success

Gallup surveys reveal that while public trust in businesses' responsible use of AI is growing, concerns about job displacement and AI's overall impact remain significant, highlighting the need for transparency and proactive trust-building measures.

English
United States
EconomyTechnologyAiTransparencyBusinessTrustGallup
MitGallupBentley University
Na
How can businesses address public concerns about AI and foster greater trust?
Transparency is key. The survey indicates that nearly 60% of Americans want businesses to be transparent about AI usage, including decision-making processes, impacted groups, job implications, and human oversight. Proactive communication and engagement with employees and customers are also crucial.
What is the most significant finding from the recent Gallup surveys regarding public perception of AI?
Gallup's 2025 surveys show that only 31% of Americans trust businesses to use AI responsibly, while 57% believe AI causes as much harm as good. This indicates a significant gap between business AI adoption and public confidence, despite a slight increase in trust since 2023.
What are the long-term implications for businesses that fail to prioritize public trust in their AI initiatives?
Businesses neglecting to build trust risk hindering AI adoption, damaging customer relationships, struggling to attract talent, and facing increased regulatory scrutiny. The "trust dividend"—the tangible benefits of public confidence—will be lost, potentially limiting the long-term success of AI initiatives.

Cognitive Concepts

1/5

Framing Bias

The article presents a balanced view of the impact of AI, highlighting both the potential benefits and the concerns surrounding its use. While it emphasizes the importance of trust and transparency, it also acknowledges the economic benefits of AI adoption. The headline, 'Are Businesses Measuring the Wrong Things—Again?', frames the issue as a call for improved measurement practices, not as a condemnation of AI itself. This framing encourages a constructive discussion rather than a polarizing one.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective. The author uses factual data from Gallup surveys to support their claims, avoiding emotionally charged language. Terms like "trust dividend" are used, but they are explained in a way that clarifies their meaning and avoids hyperbole.

2/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses primarily on the perspective of American businesses and consumers. Other perspectives, such as those from AI developers or international businesses, are not included. This omission could limit the scope of the analysis but it's not necessarily a bias as the focus is clearly stated.

Sustainable Development Goals

Responsible Consumption and Production Positive
Direct Relevance

The article emphasizes the importance of transparency and responsible use of AI in businesses. Building public trust through transparency in AI implementation is directly related to responsible consumption and production, ensuring that AI technologies are developed and used sustainably and ethically. The call for businesses to track trust scores and link senior pay to public trust metrics underscores responsible business practices and accountability.