elmundo.es
Putin's UN Charter Endorsement Signals Geopolitical Shift
During a May 8, 2025, dinner celebrating the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII, Putin's unexpected endorsement of the UN Charter, echoed by China, reveals a significant geopolitical shift where Russia aligns with China to fill the power vacuum created by the US's rejection of multilateralism under Trump, leaving the EU largely ineffective.
- How has the US's withdrawal from key international organizations under Trump contributed to the realignment of global power dynamics between China and Russia?
- This sudden conversion isn't a change in Putin's autocratic vision, but rather a strategic alignment with China to fill the void left by Trump's rejection of the international system. The US, under Trump, actively undermines its own creation, while the EU remains largely ineffective. China, having long sought to maintain the multilateral system while reinterpreting liberal principles through a Confucian lens, has found an unexpected ally in Russia, highlighting a possible subordination of Russia to China.
- What is the most significant geopolitical shift reflected in Putin's seemingly contradictory statement about upholding international law, and what are its immediate consequences?
- It is essential to guarantee strict compliance with the fundamental norms and principles of International Law, enshrined in the UN Charter." These words, spoken by Putin during a dinner on May 8, 2025, for heads of state celebrating the 80th anniversary of the end of the Great Patriotic War, mark a surprising shift in his rhetoric. This praise for multilateralism wasn't isolated, echoing in statements from both Putin and the Chinese president throughout the military parade.
- What are the long-term implications of the EU's current response to the erosion of the multilateral system, and what specific actions could it take to effectively counter the influence of China and Russia?
- The resulting coordination between China and Russia, evident in their "limitless friendship" and actions in Ukraine, poses a significant challenge to the existing international order. The EU's reactive approach, marked by a lack of concrete proposals despite acknowledging the threat, contrasts sharply with the proactive stances of China and Russia. The global south, benefiting from the multilateral system but wary of China's model, faces an uncertain future.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently portrays China as a proactive, strategic actor leading the shift in global power dynamics. Russia is presented as a follower or subordinate. The US is depicted as self-destructive and retreating. This framing potentially reinforces a narrative of inevitable Chinese dominance and minimizes the agency of other players. The headline (if there were one) would heavily influence the framing. For example, a headline such as "China's Rise: Russia Aligns as US Retreats" sets a strongly biased frame.
Language Bias
The text uses strong, loaded language such as "despótico" (despotic) to describe Putin, "adalid del Imperio del Medio" (standard-bearer of the Middle Kingdom) for Xi, and "gamusino" (foolish) to describe Trump's attempts at distancing China and Russia. These choices are not neutral and convey a clear authorial viewpoint. More neutral alternatives would replace these terms with descriptive phrasing, focusing on their actions and policies rather than using charged adjectives.
Bias by Omission
The analysis omits discussion of potential motivations behind Russia's apparent shift towards supporting multilateralism beyond the explanation of China's influence and the US's withdrawal. It also doesn't explore alternative interpretations of China's actions, beyond its stated goals. The perspectives of other global actors beyond the US, EU, China, Russia and some BRICS nations are largely absent. This limits a full understanding of the complexities involved.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor framing of the situation, portraying a choice between a US-led order and a China-Russia led one. It overlooks the potential for other alliances and configurations, as well as the possibility of reform within existing multilateral structures.
Gender Bias
The analysis focuses on actions and statements of male leaders, reflecting a common bias in geopolitical analysis. There is no explicit gender bias in language but the lack of focus on female leaders or perspectives constitutes an omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the weakening of the multilateral system, symbolized by the US withdrawal from international agreements and organizations, and the contrasting actions of China and Russia. This undermines the principles of international law and cooperation, crucial for maintaining peace and justice. The EU's inaction further exacerbates the situation.