lemonde.fr
Record Crowds at Dak'Art Biennale Lead to Artwork Damage
The 15th Dak'Art Biennale in Dakar, Senegal (November 7th-December 7th), attracted record crowds due to viral TikTok videos, but this popularity also led to significant damage and theft of several artworks, prompting a review of security and logistics.
- How did the use of TikTok impact the overall experience and security of the Dak'Art Biennale?
- The Biennale's shift from an elite event to a massively popular one, fueled by social media, highlights the challenges of balancing accessibility with the preservation of art. Viral TikTok videos showcasing the event attracted a large, largely inexperienced audience, leading to security issues and damage.
- What were the immediate consequences of the Dak'Art Biennale's unprecedented popularity driven by TikTok?
- The 15th Dak'Art Biennale in Dakar, Senegal, saw record attendance, largely driven by viral TikTok videos. This unprecedented popularity, while positive for exposure, resulted in damage to several artworks, including broken sculptures and theft of items.
- What long-term changes are needed to address the challenges revealed by the overwhelming response and subsequent damages at the 2024 Dak'Art Biennale?
- The overwhelming success and subsequent damage at Dak'Art 2024 necessitate a critical review of logistical planning and security measures for future biennales. The event's reliance on state funding and the director's silence amidst criticism suggest a need for greater transparency and accountability in future planning and execution.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately highlight the chaotic aspects of the Biennale, setting a negative tone. The article prioritizes the negative consequences (damage to art) over the positive (record attendance, new audience engagement). The descriptions of the crowd emphasize their disruptive behaviour ('ingérable', 'chaos général'), shaping the reader's perception towards a predominantly negative view, even though the director acknowledges the success.
Language Bias
The article uses language that leans towards the negative, such as 'chaos général', 'ingérable', 'détoriations', and 'vandalisme'. These terms create a sense of disorder and destruction. While accurate descriptions of events, using more neutral language like 'large crowds', 'logistical challenges', 'damage to artwork', and 'acts of vandalism' would provide a more balanced tone. The repeated use of words like 'invasion' when describing the large audience subtly frames the event's popularity negatively.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of the Biennale's popularity, such as damage to artwork and logistical challenges. It mentions the positive aspects—record attendance and the introduction of a new audience—but doesn't explore them in as much depth. The perspectives of artists whose work was damaged are not directly included, leaving a gap in understanding their experiences and reactions. While acknowledging the logistical challenges, the article doesn't delve into potential solutions or preventative measures implemented beyond increased security. This omission limits a comprehensive understanding of the event's success and shortcomings.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the 'chaos' caused by the large, largely young audience and the overall success of the Biennale in attracting record numbers. It doesn't fully explore the nuances of balancing accessibility and preservation, or the potential for finding creative solutions to manage large crowds while protecting the artwork. The framing limits a more complex discussion of the event's impact.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several individuals involved in the Biennale, both men and women. There doesn't appear to be an overt gender bias in the selection or description of sources. However, it could benefit from including more diverse perspectives from artists and attendees to ensure a balanced representation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Biennale attracted a large, young audience, many of whom were experiencing contemporary art for the first time. This suggests increased exposure to art and culture, contributing to broader educational goals. However, the negative impact of the damage to the art pieces needs to be considered.