lexpress.fr
Record Fines for Google and Shein: €325 Million and €150 Million for Cookie Consent Violations
France's CNIL imposed record fines—€325 million on Google and €150 million on Shein—for violating user consent rules regarding advertising cookies, impacting tens of millions of French users.
- What are the key findings of the CNIL's actions against Google and Shein?
- The CNIL fined Google €325 million and Shein €150 million for failing to obtain free and informed consent from users before collecting advertising cookies. These are among the largest fines ever levied by the CNIL, excluding a previous €150 million fine against Google in 2022.
- What specific violations led to these sanctions, and how many users were affected?
- Shein's violation involved a lack of user consent, insufficient information, and a flawed withdrawal mechanism for cookies, affecting 12 million monthly users in France. Google's violations included a 'cookie wall' requiring consent without adequate information and unauthorized banner ads in Gmail, impacting 53 million French users.
- What are the broader implications of this ruling for online advertising and data privacy?
- The ruling reinforces the strict regulations around user consent for advertising cookies. The substantial fines signal a strong commitment to enforcing data privacy laws and could encourage other companies to prioritize user consent and transparency in their advertising practices. Both companies plan to appeal the decision.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a relatively neutral framing of the events, presenting both sides of the story. While it highlights the severity of the fines, it also includes statements from both Google and Shein, allowing for a degree of counter-narrative. However, the headline and opening paragraphs focus on the substantial fines, potentially shaping initial reader perception towards a narrative of corporate wrongdoing.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, employing terms like "fines", "sanctions", and "non-compliance". There's a minimal use of emotionally charged language. However, the description of Shein's response as claiming the fine is "totally disproportionate" and imputing the severity to "political considerations" could be interpreted as slightly biased, although the article presents it factually.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from further context on the specific types of cookies involved and the precise nature of their data collection practices. Additional details on the legal framework governing online advertising and cookie consent in France and the EU would enhance reader understanding. While the article mentions the 'cookie wall' practice, further explanation of the complexities of this issue could prove beneficial.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights significant fines levied against Google and Shein for violating user consent regulations regarding online advertising cookies. These actions directly relate to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) because they promote ethical data handling practices and consumer protection. The fines incentivize companies to prioritize responsible data collection and transparent user consent, thereby contributing to sustainable consumption and production patterns. The Cnil's actions promote responsible business practices and consumer rights, aligning with SDG 12 targets to ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns and protect consumer rights.