welt.de
Record High in Right-Wing Extremism in Rhineland-Palatinate
In Rhineland-Palatinate, right-wing extremist crimes reached a record high of 1,471 in 2024, a significant increase contributing to a 26% rise in overall politically motivated crime to 2,532 offenses; connections between the AfD and other far-right groups are a key factor.
- How is the AfD implicated in the rise of right-wing extremism in Rhineland-Palatinate?
- The rise in right-wing extremism is linked to increased networking between the AfD and other far-right groups, including the Junge Alternative and Identitäre Bewegung. The presence of individuals with ties to these groups within the AfD's 2024 local election candidates further underscores this connection.
- What is the number of right-wing extremist offenses recorded in Rhineland-Palatinate in 2024, and how does this compare to previous years?
- In 2024, right-wing extremism in Rhineland-Palatinate reached a new high since 2001, with 1,471 offenses, an 18% increase. This represents the largest portion of the 2,532 politically motivated crimes recorded, a 26% overall increase.
- What are the long-term implications of the increasing connection between the AfD and other far-right groups for the stability of Rhineland-Palatinate's democracy?
- The continued rise in right-wing extremism and its connection to the AfD pose a significant long-term threat to the stability of Rhineland-Palatinate's democratic order. The presence of individuals with extremist pasts in mainstream politics necessitates increased monitoring and counter-extremism efforts.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames right-wing extremism and Islamism as primary threats, highlighting their increasing activity and potential for violence. The headline and emphasis on these groups could create a disproportionate perception of their danger compared to other threats. This is evident in the amount of detail devoted to these groups versus others.
Language Bias
The language used is mostly neutral, using terms like "rechtsextremistischen Gruppierungen" and "jihadistische Terrorismus." However, the repeated emphasis on "highest ever" numbers for right-wing extremism and the description of the AfD as "not a party like any other" could be considered loaded language, influencing the reader's perception.
Bias by Omission
The text focuses heavily on right-wing extremism and Islamism, giving less detailed information on left-wing extremism and Reichsbürger. The analysis lacks specific numbers on the types of crimes committed by each group, focusing primarily on overall numbers of individuals monitored. The inclusion of 'hybride Strategien' from foreign states is mentioned but lacks specific detail on the nature and scale of these threats. The perspective of those accused or monitored is absent, potentially creating an incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a dichotomy between right-wing extremism and Islamism as the most dangerous threats, potentially overlooking other significant risks or nuances in the security landscape. The lack of detailed comparison between the threat levels of these groups and others (e.g., left-wing extremism) prevents a more nuanced understanding.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a rise in politically motivated crimes, with right-wing extremism accounting for the majority. This directly impacts SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The increase in right-wing extremism undermines these goals by fostering violence, intolerance, and undermining institutions.