repubblica.it
Record January Heat: Climate Change Accelerates Beyond Predictions
January 2025 recorded the highest average global temperature ever, exceeding the 1991-2020 average by 0.79°C and pre-industrial levels by 1.75°C, despite the end of El Niño; this unexpected surge fuels concerns of accelerated climate change and potential explanations, including reduced ship emissions, are being debated.
- What is the significance of January 2025 setting a new record high temperature despite the end of the El Niño weather pattern?
- January 2025 was the hottest January on record, exceeding the 1991-2020 average by 0.79 degrees Celsius and the pre-industrial average by 1.75 degrees Celsius, according to Copernicus Climate Change Service. This follows 2024 as the warmest year on record, despite the end of the El Niño event. The unexpectedly high temperatures raise concerns about climate change acceleration.
- How might reduced sulfur emissions from ships, as suggested by James Hansen, contribute to the observed acceleration of global warming?
- The record January temperatures are alarming because they occurred despite the dissipation of El Niño, which typically raises Pacific Ocean temperatures. This suggests a faster-than-anticipated warming trend, exceeding even pessimistic predictions. The exceeding of the 1.5-degree Celsius limit set by the Paris Agreement in 18 of the last 19 months further emphasizes the severity of the situation.
- What are the long-term implications of consistently exceeding the temperature limits set by the Paris Agreement, and what potential future scenarios are projected based on current trends?
- One potential explanation for the accelerated warming, proposed by James Hansen, involves reduced sulfur emissions from ships due to new regulations. While sulfur particles reflect sunlight, their reduction may have amplified the greenhouse effect, contributing to the observed temperature rise. This hypothesis, however, is not universally accepted within the scientific community. Hansen's research suggests exceeding the 2-degree Celsius limit by 2045, deeming both the 1.5 and 2-degree limits unattainable.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity and unexpected nature of the temperature increases, using alarming language such as "accelerazione capace di cogliere di sorpresa" and "patto col diavolo." The headline and introductory paragraphs immediately establish a tone of urgency and concern, potentially influencing reader perception towards a more pessimistic outlook. The inclusion of the phrase "1.5 is dead" further reinforces this alarmist framing.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, emotive language to describe the temperature increases, such as "sorpresa," "torrida," and "patto col diavolo." These choices create a sense of alarm and urgency, which, while potentially impactful, may not reflect complete neutrality. More neutral alternatives might include terms like "unexpected," "high," and "agreement." The use of the term "doping" to describe the effect of sulfur emissions is another example of charged language.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the record-breaking temperatures and their potential causes, but omits discussion of potential solutions or policy responses to climate change. While acknowledging space constraints is reasonable, mentioning existing mitigation efforts or potential future actions would provide a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between the effects of El Niño and the reduction in sulfur emissions from ships. It implies a direct causal link between the reduction in sulfur and the rapid temperature increase, while acknowledging some scientific disagreement. However, the complexity of climate change is not fully explored, and other contributing factors are not thoroughly discussed.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that January 2025 was the hottest January on record, exceeding the pre-industrial average by 1.75 degrees Celsius. This surpasses the 1.5-degree limit set by the Paris Agreement, indicating a significant acceleration in global warming and a substantial setback for climate action goals. The reduction in sulfur emissions from ships, intended to improve air quality, is presented as a contributing factor to this accelerated warming by removing a previously existing (albeit polluting) cooling effect. The quote "1.5 is dead" encapsulates the severity of the situation and the failure to meet the crucial climate target.