lexpress.fr
Record Russian Attacks on Ukraine: Slow Gains Masked by Intensified Air Campaign
On May 25th, 2024, Russia launched a record 298 drones and 69 missiles on Ukraine, killing or injuring around sixty civilians, as part of a strategy to demoralize Ukraine and wear down its defenses while masking its slow military gains.
- What are the immediate consequences of Russia's intensified air strikes on Ukraine, and what is their strategic objective?
- On May 25th, 2024, a record 298 drones and 69 missiles hit Ukraine, injuring or killing an estimated sixty civilians. Russia's intensified air strikes aim to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses, demoralize the population, and convince the West of inevitable Russian victory, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).
- How does Russia's slow military progress in Ukraine contrast with its intensified air campaign, and what strategies are employed to overcome Ukrainian defenses?
- Russia's current military advance in Ukraine is extremely slow; the ISW estimates it would take 83 years to capture the remaining 80% of Ukraine at the present rate, resulting in the loss of a third of Russia's population based on a daily loss of 1500 soldiers. This slow progress is masked by increased drone production (100 Iranian Shahed drones daily) and the use of AI and social media to guide attacks.
- What are the long-term implications of the depletion of US Patriot missiles and Russia's anticipated economic downturn on the conflict in Ukraine and the potential for de-escalation?
- The depletion of US Patriot missile stocks due to Russian ballistic missile strikes, coupled with the Trump administration's reluctance to provide more, is a significant concern. Russia's anticipated 24% decrease in energy revenue by 2025 will necessitate severe budget cuts, impacting key industrial programs. This economic pressure, alongside intensified sanctions, could sow doubt amongst Russian elites and potentially curb Putin's aggression.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the scale of Russian attacks and their supposed effectiveness in wearing down Ukrainian defenses, potentially downplaying Ukrainian resistance and resilience. The headline, if any, likely highlights the sheer number of attacks rather than broader strategic context. The use of phrases like "asphyxiate Kiev" and "foolish war" reveals a bias against Russia's actions.
Language Bias
The article uses charged language such as "asphyxiate Kiev", "foolish war", and "engins de mort" (engines of death). These terms are emotionally loaded and contribute to a negative portrayal of Russia's actions. Neutral alternatives could include phrases like "intense bombardments of Kyiv", "the war in Ukraine", and "weapons systems". The repeated emphasis on the destructive capabilities of Russian weapons systems further reinforces this negative portrayal.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Russian perspective and military actions, while Ukrainian perspectives and civilian experiences beyond the initial casualty figures are largely absent. The lack of detailed analysis of Ukrainian defense strategies and their effectiveness, as well as the impact of the war on Ukrainian infrastructure and economy, presents a biased view. The article also omits discussion regarding international efforts beyond the mentioned US Patriot missiles and sanctions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that only intensifying sanctions or pressuring OPEC+ to maintain low oil prices are the only levers to stop Putin. It ignores other potential approaches such as diplomatic initiatives, internal dissent within Russia, or shifts in global alliances.
Gender Bias
The article features a female expert, Vera Grantseva, but her analysis is presented within a predominantly male-dominated narrative concerning military actions and political strategies. While there is no overt gender bias in language, the lack of women in decision-making positions being discussed contributes to an overall gender imbalance in the framing of the conflict.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ongoing war in Ukraine, characterized by extensive drone and missile attacks causing civilian casualties, directly undermines peace and security. The conflict also disrupts justice systems and weakens state institutions in Ukraine. The article highlights the Kremlin's disregard for cease-fire calls and the devastating impact of the war on Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure.