liberation.fr
Resilient Architecture: Responding to the Polycrisis
The 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale, in partnership with the Institut français, showcases architectural solutions promoting resilience in the face of the global polycrisis, emphasizing adaptation, resourcefulness, and community engagement.
- What are the key characteristics of resilient architecture, as exemplified by the projects showcased at the Biennale?
- The Biennale showcases projects emphasizing resilience through strategies such as repurposing existing buildings, utilizing local resources, and incorporating nature into design. This approach contrasts with traditional architecture that often aims to control or eliminate instability. The polycrisis necessitates a shift towards adaptable, integrated solutions.
- How are architects responding to the multifaceted global crisis (polycrisis) and what specific design strategies are being employed?
- The 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale explores architectural responses to the "polycrisis," a complex interplay of global crises. Architects are addressing this by focusing on resilience—the ability to adapt to change without losing core function. This involves integrating existing structures, local resources, and natural elements into designs.
- How will the architect's role evolve in the context of the polycrisis, and what new skills or perspectives will be essential for future practice?
- The evolving role of the architect is highlighted, expanding beyond design to encompass research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and community engagement. This shift is crucial for addressing complex challenges posed by the polycrisis. Future architectural practice will necessitate a holistic approach, integrating ecological, social, and technological considerations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is positive, emphasizing resilience and adaptability in architecture's response to the polycrisis. This is evident in the repeated focus on positive solutions and the description of architects' expanded roles. While highlighting positive aspects is important, a balanced perspective acknowledging challenges would strengthen the analysis.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. However, terms like "remarkable inventivity" and "repairing life" could be considered slightly loaded, suggesting a positive and perhaps overly optimistic view. More precise and less emotionally charged language might be beneficial.
Bias by Omission
The text focuses on architectural responses to polycrises, but omits discussion of potential negative consequences or unintended effects of proposed solutions. While acknowledging the complexity of the issue, a more comprehensive analysis would benefit from including potential downsides.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses architectural solutions for adapting to instability and crises, focusing on resilience, resourcefulness, and community engagement. These approaches directly address the challenges of building sustainable and resilient cities capable of withstanding various shocks, aligning with SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) which aims to make cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.