dw.com
Richest 10% Responsible for Two-Thirds of Global Warming Since 1990
The wealthiest 10% of the global population caused two-thirds of global warming since 1990, significantly increasing deadly heatwaves and droughts, according to a Nature Climate Change study which also found that the richest 1% contributed 26 times more to once-per-century heatwaves than the global average.
- What is the specific contribution of the wealthiest 10% to global warming since 1990, and what are the immediate consequences?
- A new study published in Nature Climate Change reveals that the wealthiest 10% of the global population is responsible for two-thirds of global warming since 1990. Their consumption and investment patterns have significantly increased the risk of deadly heatwaves and droughts. This is linked directly to real-world climate impacts.
- How did the researchers quantify the impact of the wealthiest individuals' actions on extreme weather events, and what methodologies did they employ?
- The study quantifies the impact of concentrated private wealth on extreme weather events. For example, the richest 1% contributed 26 times more to once-per-century heatwaves and 17 times more to Amazonian droughts than the global average. Emissions from the richest 10% in China and the US account for almost half of global carbon pollution.
- What are the long-term implications of the stalled initiatives to tax extreme wealth, and what alternative approaches could be more effective in mitigating climate change?
- The research included "hidden emissions" from financial investments, not just lifestyle and personal consumption. While proposals for taxing extreme wealth have stalled, the study highlights the inequity of general emissions taxes and suggests that taxing emissions linked to assets is a fairer approach. The lack of progress on taxing the ultra-wealthy despite G20 agreements underscores a significant challenge in addressing climate change.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the negative impact of the wealthy's consumption and investment, using strong language such as "two-thirds of global warming" and "mortally dangerous heat waves." The headline and introduction immediately highlight the culpability of the wealthy, potentially shaping the reader's perception before presenting the full context of the study's methodology and findings.
Language Bias
The language used is largely factual and neutral. However, phrases like "mortally dangerous heat waves" and "super-rich" are emotionally charged and could be replaced with more neutral terms like "severe heat waves" and "high-net-worth individuals" to maintain objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the impact of the wealthiest 10% on climate change, but omits discussion of the cumulative effect of the remaining 90%, potentially underrepresenting the overall contribution to global warming. While acknowledging limitations of scope is implied, a more explicit acknowledgement and brief summary of the 90% contribution would improve the analysis. Additionally, the article doesn't explore potential solutions beyond taxation, overlooking other mitigation and adaptation strategies.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the wealthiest 10% and the rest of the world's population. While highlighting the disproportionate impact of the wealthy, it doesn't delve into the complexities of global climate change, such as the differing levels of emissions across various socioeconomic groups within that top 10%, or the roles of government policies and industrial practices.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that the wealthiest 10% of the global population is responsible for two-thirds of global warming since 1990, significantly impacting climate change and increasing the risk of extreme weather events. Their consumption and investment patterns are directly linked to increased instances of deadly heatwaves and droughts. This directly contradicts efforts to mitigate climate change as outlined in the Paris Agreement and related SDG targets.