faz.net
Right-Wing Appropriation of "Grenzüberschreitung": A Shift in Political Discourse
The German term "Grenzüberschreitung" (border crossing), originating in left-wing philosophy, has been adopted by the right-wing as a political slogan, signifying a shift in political discourse and a rise of far-right parties.
- What are the underlying philosophical and social factors that have contributed to the right-wing adoption of a term traditionally associated with left-wing thought?
- The appropriation of "Grenzüberschreitung" by the right illustrates a concerning trend in which established political discourse is being manipulated to gain power. The rise of right-wing parties demonstrates the effectiveness of this tactic, leveraging social anxieties and frustration to achieve electoral victories.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this semantic shift for the future of liberal democracy and the broader political discourse in societies grappling with these changes?
- The increasing adoption of "Grenzüberschreitung" by the right wing signals a potential erosion of liberal democracies. This development, coupled with the rise of right-libertarian billionaires and autocratic politicians, indicates a systemic shift with potentially existential consequences for many.
- How has the right-wing appropriation of the term "Grenzüberschreitung" impacted the political landscape, specifically in terms of electoral outcomes and the rise of far-right parties?
- The term "Grenzüberschreitung" (border crossing), originally from left-wing philosophy, has been adopted by the right as a political slogan. This shift reflects a broader collapse of political reason, where resentment and disruptive rhetoric translate into electoral success for far-right parties.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately frame the narrative around the right-wing adoption of "Grenzüberschreitung." This choice sets the tone and may predispose the reader to view the phenomenon negatively, potentially overshadowing other perspectives on the term and its evolution. The article consistently emphasizes the negative consequences of this shift, potentially overlooking any potential positive aspects or unintended consequences of the phenomenon.
Language Bias
The article uses terms like "rechtsextreme Parteien" (far-right parties) and describes the political climate as a "collapse of political reason." These choices convey a negative tone, framing the right-wing use of the term as problematic. While this might be an accurate assessment for some readers, using less charged vocabulary might ensure greater neutrality. For example, instead of "collapse," the article could use terms like "shift" or "transformation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the appropriation of the term "Grenzüberschreitung" by the right wing, but omits discussion of potential left-wing uses of the term that might not align with the presented narrative. It also lacks diverse perspectives on the political and societal shifts described. The article mentions the 'collapse of political reason' and the rise of right-wing parties, but doesn't offer alternative interpretations or counterarguments to these claims.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the left and right interpretations of "Grenzüberschreitung," potentially overlooking nuances or more complex understandings of the term and its usage within different political contexts. It implicitly frames the right-wing adoption as negative, without fully exploring the possible motivations or interpretations behind it.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the appropriation of the term "Grenzüberschreitung" (boundary crossing) by the right wing, highlighting the erosion of political reason and the rise of extremist parties. This signifies a breakdown in democratic institutions and processes, directly impacting SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) negatively.