taz.de
Rise of Authoritarian Right-Wing Movements and the Resurgence of Fascist Ideologies
Historian Dagmar Herzog argues that a global rise of authoritarian right-wing movements, exemplified by the AfD in Germany, mirrors historical fascist patterns, particularly concerning the treatment of disabled individuals and the use of 'sexy racism' in political campaigns.
- What are the key characteristics of the current global resurgence of fascist ideologies according to historian Dagmar Herzog?
- Herzog identifies the global rise of authoritarian right-wing movements as a crucial indicator. She points to their opposition to human values like freedom, equality, and empathy, and their coexistence with democratic systems in many societies. The AfD's aggressive stance against the inclusion of disabled individuals serves as a particular example.
- How does the AfD's campaign strategy exemplify the resurgence of fascist ideologies, and what historical parallels does Herzog draw?
- Herzog highlights the AfD's use of 'sexy racism' in campaigns, employing provocative imagery combining eroticism with anti-immigrant sentiments. She parallels this with historical Nazi propaganda, citing similar tactics of combining sexual imagery with dehumanization of minority groups, illustrating a deliberate strategy of inciting hatred and establishing dominance.
- What are the long-term implications of the observed trends, and what potential solutions or preventative measures does Herzog suggest?
- Herzog expresses concern that the normalization of cruelty and the erosion of empathy, particularly evident in the AfD's rhetoric against disabled individuals, could lead to lasting damage to democratic societies. While she doesn't explicitly endorse banning the AfD, she suggests that preventing them from gaining power is crucial, drawing a parallel to the insufficient response to Trump's actions in the US.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the discussion around the AfD's actions and rhetoric, highlighting their stances on disability inclusion and immigration. The framing emphasizes the negative consequences of the AfD's policies and rhetoric, potentially influencing readers to view the party negatively. The use of quotes from AfD members serves to illustrate the severity of their views.
Language Bias
While the article maintains a largely neutral tone, the choice of words like "obsessively disabled-hostile" and "wüten" (raging) to describe the AfD's position on disability inclusion carries a strong negative connotation. The comparison to Nazi propaganda also creates a strong emotional response. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "strongly opposed to disability inclusion" and a less emotionally charged description of the AfD's actions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the AfD in Germany, potentially omitting other examples of authoritarian right-wing movements globally that may not share the same specific characteristics regarding disability inclusion. It may also underrepresent counterarguments or differing perspectives on the effectiveness of inclusive policies in Germany, or the complexity of other political movements.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between democracy and fascism, suggesting a simplistic eitheor scenario. The reality is that many societies exist on a spectrum, and the coexistence of democratic and fascistic elements is a more nuanced situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the AfD's targeting of people with disabilities, which exacerbates existing inequalities. The AfD's rhetoric and policies aim to exclude and marginalize vulnerable groups, thus hindering progress towards reducing inequalities. The historical context of eugenics in Germany and its present-day manifestation in the AfD's actions are highlighted, demonstrating a continuation of discriminatory practices that deepen societal divisions.