welt.de
Riyadh Talks: US-Mediated Negotiations Between Ukraine and Russia
In Riyadh, separate US teams negotiate with Ukrainian and Russian representatives, including Sergey Besseda, a Putin confidant and former FSB official, aiming for a Black Sea ceasefire and ultimately, an end to the war in Ukraine.
- How do the internal political dynamics within Ukraine and Russia influence their respective negotiating positions and potential concessions?
- These talks, initiated amidst Trump's campaign promise of a swift war end, reveal a complex interplay of interests. The US aims to pressure Putin to end the war, while Ukraine seeks survival and security guarantees in exchange for concessions, facing internal pressure against territorial compromises. Russia, leveraging battlefield gains, seeks to prolong the conflict, extracting further concessions from Ukraine.
- What are the immediate goals of the US and Ukraine in the ongoing Riyadh negotiations, and what specific actions are being taken to achieve them?
- Three separate teams—led by Keith Kellogg, Mike Waltz, and the US State Department—are conducting parallel negotiations in Riyadh between Ukraine and Russia. The Ukrainians are represented by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov and chief negotiator Andriy Yermak; Russia by Georgi Karassin and Sergey Besseda. A short-term US goal is a Black Sea ceasefire, as discussed by Trump and Putin.
- What are the long-term geopolitical implications of these negotiations, considering the evolving relationship between Russia and China, and what scenarios are most likely to emerge?
- The success of these negotiations hinges on several factors, including the extent of US influence over Putin, the credibility of Trump's statements, and the willingness of Ukraine to accept potentially unpopular territorial concessions. The long-term US objective of improved relations with Russia, given growing Sino-Russian ties, adds another layer of complexity. A full ceasefire is unlikely without a change in European military support for Ukraine.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers on Trump's efforts and challenges in brokering a deal, casting him as the central figure attempting to resolve the conflict. While acknowledging Ukrainian and Russian positions, the narrative prioritizes the American perspective and Trump's political pressures. Headlines or subheadings emphasizing Trump's role would further reinforce this bias. The article also seems to present Russia's actions as primarily driven by Putin's personal ambitions and strategic goals, neglecting potential internal political dynamics or other factors that might influence Russia's behavior.
Language Bias
The article uses language that sometimes leans towards characterizing Putin as a shrewd, manipulative player ("gewiefter Verhandler") and Trump as facing political pressures and struggling to make progress. Words like "hart" (hard) to describe the Russian negotiating position or describing Putin as waiting for Ukrainian "Selbsterkenntnis" (self-awareness) imply judgment and interpretation. Neutral alternatives would be to describe the Russian position as 'uncompromising' and avoid implying a psychological interpretation of Putin's actions. More generally, the article could benefit from consistently using neutral descriptive language to avoid editorializing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspectives of the US, Russia, and Ukraine's leadership, potentially omitting the voices and experiences of ordinary citizens in all three countries. The impact of the war on civilians is largely absent from the analysis. Further, while acknowledging internal Ukrainian political pressures regarding territorial concessions, the article lacks detail on the spectrum of public opinion within Ukraine beyond a single poll mentioning opposition to territorial concessions. The economic consequences of the war on all involved nations are also largely omitted.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between a rapid peace negotiated by Trump and the continuation of the war. It oversimplifies the complexities of the conflict and the various actors involved, including the potential for different forms of conflict resolution beyond a simple peace agreement or ongoing war. The narrative frames the situation as a direct negotiation between Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy, ignoring the multitude of internal and external factors shaping the conflict.
Gender Bias
The article primarily focuses on the actions and statements of male political leaders. While mentioning the Ukrainian defense minister Rustem Umjerow, there's a lack of prominent female voices or perspectives from any of the countries involved, potentially underrepresenting women's experiences and roles in the conflict. The analysis lacks discussion on gender-based violence or the disproportionate impact of war on women.