lexpress.fr
Rogoff Predicts US Cryptocurrency Crisis Under Trump Deregulation
Kenneth Rogoff, a Harvard professor and former IMF chief economist, predicts a US cryptocurrency financial crisis by the end of Donald Trump's presidency due to aggressive deregulation, highlighting the significant use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities and the lack of regulatory oversight.
- How does Kenneth Rogoff explain the involvement of major financial institutions like BlackRock in the cryptocurrency market?
- Rogoff argues that the media coverage of cryptocurrencies is justified due to their expanding role in the shadow economy, facilitating illegal activities. He points to BlackRock's involvement as a response to market demand, not necessarily an endorsement of crypto's long-term value. This lack of regulation, coupled with Trump's deregulation, increases the risk of a major financial crisis if a large-scale adoption occurs.
- What is the most significant risk associated with the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the US, according to Kenneth Rogoff?
- Kenneth Rogoff, a former chief economist at the IMF, predicts a cryptocurrency-related financial crisis in the US by the end of Donald Trump's presidency, driven by Trump's deregulation policies. He highlights the significant use of cryptocurrencies in illicit activities like tax evasion and drug trafficking, exceeding the role of cash. Rogoff emphasizes the lack of regulation in the US crypto market, deeming it a major systemic risk.
- What are the potential long-term systemic impacts of the current trajectory of cryptocurrency regulation and adoption in the US, particularly given Donald Trump's policies?
- Rogoff warns that the current crypto infrastructure, particularly exchanges operating like unregulated banks, poses a systemic risk. He compares the situation to the pre-2008 financial crisis, suggesting that a major cryptocurrency exchange's collapse could trigger a broader financial crisis. The lack of a lender of last resort and robust regulations creates vulnerabilities. He sees Trump's support for deregulation as accelerating this risk.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the cryptocurrency market through the lens of an impending financial crisis. The headline and introduction emphasize Rogoff's prediction of a storm, setting a negative tone and potentially influencing reader perception before presenting nuanced details. The repeated emphasis on risks and negative consequences shapes the narrative towards a pessimistic outlook.
Language Bias
Rogoff uses strong, critical language when describing aspects of the cryptocurrency market. Terms like "corrupted," "dangerous," and "disastrous" are loaded and convey a negative connotation, potentially swaying reader opinion. More neutral alternatives could include "unregulated," "risky," or "challenging." The repeated use of negative terminology amplifies the negative framing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Kenneth Rogoff's perspective and concerns about cryptocurrencies, potentially omitting counterarguments or viewpoints from proponents of cryptocurrency technology. While Rogoff's expertise is undeniable, a balanced perspective would include opinions from individuals who see potential benefits or less severe risks in the cryptocurrency market. The lack of diverse opinions could lead readers to an overly negative view of cryptocurrencies.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the potential for cryptocurrency to be used for illegal activities and its potential for legitimate use. While Rogoff highlights the former extensively, he doesn't fully explore the nuances of legitimate use cases, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) or cross-border payments, potentially leading readers to a skewed understanding of the technology's applications.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that while cryptocurrencies might appear democratic and accessible, their use in illicit activities like tax evasion, drug trafficking, and human trafficking disproportionately harms vulnerable populations and exacerbates existing inequalities. The lack of regulation further contributes to this, as it allows the wealthy and powerful to exploit the system for their own benefit while leaving the vulnerable exposed to risks.